We all know that with the appointment of the social-ist commissar Eric Holder as the U.S. Attorney General, we gun owners and supporters of the Second Amendment are in danger of becoming extinct. With his most recent statement about him and commissar osamaobama going to reinstate the assault weapons ban he has let the cat out of the bag publicly. But to most real second amendment supporters we already knew this was going to happen.
The next day after holder shooting his bunghole off, the speaker of the house publicly stated that no they were not going to ban assault weapons. This coming from commissar Nancy pissoly I mean commissar Palosi amounts to Hitler marrying a Jew out of love. It’s not going to happen. The agenda of commissar pissoly is total ban on all private gun ownership along with total subjugation of all free Americans.
So why the change of hart? Well it was not a change of hart but rather a matter of timing. Commissar pissoly is not against the ban of any weapon by us surfs but knows if they do not time it just right they will not achieve the desired results. As of this time commissar pissoly does not have the votes and means to institute a ban on anything gun related. This could change real quick, sense she is attempting to maneuver rules and laws governing our elected officials in how something can be approved without a fight from the opposition.
Some time real soon commissar pissoly will ask the House to consider a rule that will establish a time frame for debating bills submitted to them and which bills will qualify for the debate. It is believed that she will maneuver this to deny any debate or opposition to any anti-gun bill that they will receive. Make no mistake commissar pissoly is not any friend of gun owners or Second Amendment supporters.
So you might think this may put a hold on commissar Holder from instituting any gun bans. Not so because all it take is for commissar osamaobama to give commissar Holder an executive order and the ban is on. But you say this will violate the Supreme Courts ruling that it is an individual right to keep and bare arms. To us gun owners and Second Amendment supporters that would be true. However to most anti gunners this will not violate any rights sense they believe we do not have the right to start with.
All commissar Holder needs to comply with the supreme courts ruling is to allow one type of each weapons, such as you can own one revolver of S&W make in .38 special. Caliber this will appease the anti hand gun suck asses sense it does not restrict your owning a type of weapon. You will be allowed to own one bolt action rifle in .243 cal. and this will appease the demi gods of the anti gunners sense it is a rifle and this class of weapon has not been violated for ownership. You can own one double barrel shot gun in 410 gage this will appease the cum suckers of citizen disarmament.
No the courts are not on the side of the Second Amendment nor on the side of freedom and rights except for shit holes who want an abortion, or to stop all free religions in the U.S. When a Judge makes a ruling in favor of the Second Amendment, the supporters of social-ism attempt to have this Judge removed or voted out of their job. The other view by the un-American is ammunition control, they believe that the Second Amendment does not cover Ammunition and thus they can institute any control they wish.
The soon to be citizen control government will leave you with little choices. One being you can shut the fuck up and obey. The second one will be sit you ass in your easy chair and drink another brew while continuing to watch American idiot on T.V. and the third choice is open armed rebellion and civil war. So which one will you be?