Wednesday, May 30, 2007

The communists clinton

yep she is a communist and you face hell if she gets elected as President, she is a natural born enemy of all Freedoms of Americans.

Just have a good read about this bitch

Friday, May 25, 2007


If you can stop the support of these listed groups please do so, and take the time to send them a letter letting them know you will stop all support for them because of there stance on the 2nd Amendement

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Gun-Ban Proposal to be Considered in Louisiana!

Monday, May 21, 2007

On Wednesday, May 30 at 9:30 AM in HCR-6, the House Administration of Criminal Justice Committee will consider HB 869, a bill that would establish far-reaching restrictions on semi-automatic firearms (dubbing them "assault weapons") and ammunition magazines. It would target every firearm modified to conform with the now-extinct Clinton Gun-Ban plus many other semi-automatic firearms that have no lineage to those rifles or any military-style orientation whatsoever.

HB 869 would also require current owners of such firearms to register their firearms with the State Police, obtain and renew a license annually to keep them, restrict how and where they may be used or transported, and allow the State Police to inspect private homes for compliance.

Please contact your State Representative toll-free at (800) 256-3793 and respectfully urge him or her to oppose this gun-ban and to vote “NO” on HB 869.

If you from Louisiana you need to do some phone calling

Saturday, May 19, 2007

More idiocy from commiefornia

Assembly Bill 1471, sponsored by Assembly Member Mike Feuer (D-42), would require that after a certain date, the make, model, and serial number be microstamped onto the interior surface or internal working parts of all handguns in such a manner that those identifiers are imprinted onto the cartridge case upon firing. Per AB1471, handguns that did not include their identifying information would be defined as “unsafe,” and their manufacture, sale, and transfer would be a crime.

I think we should wall of commiefornia and not Mexico, let commiefornia be it's own country and not give it any aid. Let us see how long they last

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Fighting the Kotowski/Millner Civilian Disarmament Act

Give the House Executive Committee's a call to show your opposition to SB 1007. The Phone Numbers can be found at the link above.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007


For Immediate Release: 5/8/2007

BELLEVUE, WA – This morning’s decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to deny a petition from the District of Columbia for a hearing of Parker v. District of Columbia before the full court was “right and proper,” said Alan M. Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation.

“This is a strong signal that the D.C. Court of Appeals, which is the second most powerful court in the country, feels the original ruling by Senior Judge Laurence H. Silberman is solid,” Gottlieb stated. “It is now up to the district to accept the ruling and begin the process of licensing handguns to be kept legally in district residences, or to appeal the case to the Supreme Court.”

A win for the gun owners, but we can not drop our efforts, or let our guard down.

Friday, May 4, 2007

Reducing the size of the posts

I will be reducing the size of the posted articles as I post them to my web site. I will post a link to the whole article here so you can read all of it. Some of the articles are a little long winded for posting here.


Thursday, May 3, 2007

Mythology 101

Mythology 101

Assault weapons with large capacity magazines are capable of spraying thousands of rounds a second.

First off male cats spray, NOT GUNS, water hoses spray, NOT GUNS, fear mongering anti-gunners spray out there asses, NOT GUNS. I know of no assault weapon that is used today that can put out thousands of rounds a second. The more bullets that a gun puts out per minute makes for less accuracy, a hand held weapon using full auto most times results in some loss of control of the weapon by the shooter and reduces the effectiveness if the weapon.

M-16a1 has a cycle rate of 650-750 rounds per-minute, this is dependent on a continuous feed of ammo, which the M-16a1 is not designed to do. One must manually replace each magazine with another taking up time. A best guestamate of the fire rate of a M-16a1 under ideal conditions and a real good shooter is about 300-400 rounds a minute. This is a far cry from the thousands of rounds a second that most fear mongering anti-gunners spray out there asses.

The Ingram M11 in 9mm has one of the highest cycle rates coming in at a rough 1200 rounds a minute. This again is calculated on a continuous feed of ammo, which this weapon is not designed to do either. A conservative estimate is around 500 rounds a minute due to the operator having to change magazines after every 30 rounds.

A good site on the cycle rates of deferent supposed assault weapons is here.
Just click on the weapon you wish to read about on the left of the page.

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Crime in England

The next time someone tells you England has less crime then the U.S. make them read this article

About Assault Weapons

Very good video for the uninformed about Assault Weapons

Some facts.

Motorized vehicles are the most controlled things in America. We license the drivers after they study and test showing an aptitude for safe driving. But yet some 50,000 people are killed each year in America in auto accidents and 2+ million are permantly maimed or crippled. Roughly 65% or those killed were due to drinking/drugs and driving.

Contraire to popular opinion no one is guaranteed the right to drive under the constitution or even own a car. So I say take away all autos sense they evidently cause a hell of a lot more deaths each year then Guns do. You can walk or ride a horse.

The use of a gun to stop crime in America is 1.6-2.5 million times a year.80% of the crimes were of a violent nature with the possibility of severe injury and or death. If guns are banned then we can convert it to a form of genocide.

In the state of Kentucky we have issued over 300,000 Carry Concealed Weapons permits and have yet to have our streets run red with blood. There are no gunfights at the OK coral for the anti-gunners to point at and say see we told you so.

Out of 80 million gun owners in the U.S. they account for over 125 million known guns that is around 1.5 guns per person. There are a number of guns that are unaccounted for in the U.S.

80 million gun owners counts for close to 65% of legal voters, but yet cannot agree on who should be in congress and the Presidency.

Close to 20% will give up their guns without even a bad word being said if the Government bans ownership of them. Still leaving a citizen army of +/- 64 million.

Of the 64 million gun owners left, well over 20 million will submit to search and seizure of weapons but may voice opposition to the illegal action. Leaving 44 million to fight the tyrannies of our Government. 44 million gun owners resisting, will be one hell of an army to face.

Contrary to popular mythology 85-91% of the rank and file law enforcement does not support Gun control to include the assault weapons ban.

The Senate, The House, nor Congress has any given authority by our Constitution to ban the private ownership, purchase, use, or selling of any firearms. However they may legally tax them and can restrict the importation of weapons.

The last assault weapons ban was illegal, but people did not stand up to them and demand they repeal the law.

Assault weapons only account for 2% of the guns confiscated by L.E.A.’s in the U.S.

Less then .01% of crime in the U.S. actually is committed with Assault weapons.

Banning private ownership of guns has lead to Genocide and a suppression of personal freedoms in such nations as Darfur, Uganda, The Congo republic, and other African nations, Sudan, Ethiopia, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Burundi. Well hell just look for yourself.

Leaders in America?

As I see our Government officials, they are nothing more then a representative of the people that elect them to their JOB.

America has no leaders as per say, from the President of the United States to the local city counsel. All are elected to be our representatives and voice, nothing more. We Americans do not have leaders above us. Nowhere in our Constitution or Bill of Rights do we have, appoint, elect, leaders, but rather we appoint representatives who must speak on the behalf of those that elect them.

Other countries have leaders, many of whom are not elected to an office but rather assume this roll by Bloodline, or through Military coups. Leaders are assumed to be totally in charge of everyone under them. They make rules, and laws for governing their nation, citizens, and/or tribes. Many times leaders of other countries must be deposed by a dissenting party or disgruntled want to be leader. Which some times ends in a blood bath coup, or the leader just passing away from an unknown illness.

A leader tend to believe that what they choose is what the People under them need as apposed to letting the people decide for their selves. A leader will almost always choose governing of the masses by assuming that only they themselves have the knowledge and foresight to know the needs of the peoples. In many nations of the world the people just go along with what they are told is for their own good sense a leading body has decided for them.

Little input from the citizenry on issues that affect them is almost never sought. Most times a law is passed without the peoples even having fore knowledge of it. They wake up in the morning only to find that they are lawbreakers sometimes when they were not the night before.

In America the way our system is made, allows the people to decide for them self’s rather then just assume someone else should do it for us. No person in America is above or below anyone else. According to our Constitution and Bill of Rights all are equal in standing with every one else. America does not recognize, bestow, or appoint Royalty upon anyone. We do not recognize absolute power of a person, and/or a governing body.

All power of Government is granted by the people, to the elected to act on our behalf, as we demand by majority vote. Nothing in our structure allows for a leader who can speak for us based on his or her beliefs as to what we should want. America was designed as a truly leaderless nation. An elected official such as Nancy Pelosi from San commiecisco can only speak for the constituents who elected her to office and not the rest of the nation. In perspective, President Bush can only speak for the people who elected him to office and they both must follow the demands of the electric.

All power and authority reverts back to the people as a whole, as is in the laws of the Constitution. The Constitution was written as rules to govern the jobs of our elected.

Common sense

Let us look at the term common sense,

Main Entry: common sense Function: noun: sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts

Whos simple perception yours or mine? Common sense is not absolute and can never be absolute sense it relies on a personal perception as to what qualifies.

Common sense gun laws, just what are common sense gun laws? My perception of common sense gun laws is;

Backgrounds check on any perches of a gun.
A eligibility age for owning a gun, 21 for hand guns, and 18 for rifles and shot guns
No restrictions on magazine capacity
No restriction on cosmetic appearances or functionality of a given weapon
Open purchases between states. If your qualified in one state then you are qualified on another.
Mandatory Gun safety classes for anyone not trained by our Law Enforcement Agencies, The NRA and/or Military.
Every citizen of legal age, clean record and sound mind must own a gun
Guns that fire an explosive round must come under other training and license.
Open license for CCWP, if you qualify to own a gun then you can carry one.
Extreme penatalies for miss-use of a weapon or the possession of a weapon while committing a crime

Are these common sense laws to everyone? No they are not, there just my perception of common sense laws. Being as valid as any other perception of laws.

Another angle to the anti gun issue Nobel Privilege

Many anti gunners who wish to restrict the private possession of guns, believe that it is the little person who needs the restrictions imposed on them and not the rich and/or famous. It has been held in many circles that the privileged/elite should be allowed their right to ownership of guns for their protection.

We have seen in recent times where a city, county, or state has attempted to ban private gun ownership for the general populist under the guise of for our own good. But yet these same city, county, and states held that the rich and important should be armed. Effectively placing a value to people, based on wealth, power, or political standing in life. San commiecisco is one such city. Banning the handgun for its citizens except for political people like Diane Feinstein (1) who acquired a concealed carry weapons permit under the guise that she was worth more then the average citizen.

This kind of exclusionary belief is referred to as Nobel Privilege. Oft times seen in countries with nobility as important persons. Usually believed that the cause of nobility was a direct proof of intelligence. Though America has no nobility nor recognizes nobility with in our own country the process still remains the same. We have replaced the nobility with famous people, the rich, and the political liches. Many people in America believe that a movie star is an automatic right of intelligence and what they say must be true sense they are famous.

Nobel Privilege has its roots in the monarchy of England for the most part; sense it was believed that the nobility should still be allowed their ownership of firearms. At the same time outlawing the private ownership or possession by the common people. Even today the rich, and or nobles in England can and oft times do own firearms. The common person can by law acquire a firearm by legal means in England but the cost and legal challenges make it almost impossible.

Many of the people that believe in the concept of Nobel Privilege assert that the privileged are the only ones who have the judgment to own and carry guns. Some how this prestigious title makes them far more responsible and knowledgeable then the normal citizen. If they were far more knowledgeable then the average citizen then they would know that Congress has not authority to ban any law abiding citizen from buying, possessing, and using weapons for there own purpose. They would also know that Congress could only by law control the commerce of weapons and not the right to bare arms. As is seen with the tax stamp on full auto weapons this does not restrict a law abiding citizen from owning one but places a tax on each sales and transfer to help curb unwanted people from having them. The amount of forms to fill out and the $200 for the transfer plus the back round check by the F.B.I. prohibits felons and criminals from legally obtaining one.

The issues of Nobel Privilege, and there elitist right to self protection only leads to the belief that the common citizen is little more then meet on the hoof not worth much in ways of self preservation. Sense the courts have ruled that law enforcement is under no obligation to protect the individual citizen, but only the citizenry as a whole. The responsibility of self-protection falls to ones own self and in order for you to effectively do so you must be armed.

Don’t be fooled by the Nobel Privilege, they will always be exempt from many things that other wise would put you and I in jail. Money and fame talks and every one else dies or goes to jail.


When the handgun ban in San commiecisco took effect the news media filmed Diane Feinstein turning in her pistol. But after the cameras stopped rolling her bodyguard retrieved it and gave it back to her. (End of note 1)