As of right now we have won a big battle for our rights with the Supreme Courts ruling on the Hiller vs. D.C. case. But the war is not over by far.
Either way the ruling will not detour the anti-gunners from attempting to pass anti-gun laws on a lower level or even federal for that matter. What is needed is an Amendment to the Bill of Rights that will forbid any further attempts to remove or restrict the ownership, use, and/or purchasing of firearms to the people regardless of reasoning.
With the anti-gunners hoping to achieve gun control through local gun laws we will have a hard fight to keep them from some success. If we start a grass roots attempt to have a bill passed forbidding any further gun-control laws from being passed or forced on law abiding citizens we may be able to stave off a lot of little attempts that will drain a lot of private money to fight to have them repealed.
If you agree with my recommendations listed here, copy them and send them to your Senator, and Congressman, demanding that they pass this into Constitutional Law.
Definition of the term Fire Arm here in is as follows.
(a) Any handgun, rifle, shotgun of the common type used by the Military in defense of the nation that may be carried by the citizen as a personal weapon. To include Assault type weapons, single shot, bolt action, semi-automatic, and full automatic functioning.
(b) Any personal weapon that can be used for legal hunting, recreational shooting, target practus, and/or self-defense of property, persons, state, and/or country.
Definition of the term Feeding device here in is as follows.
(a) Any device, clip, magazine, belt designed to feed ammunition in a limited or continuous capacity.
I feel the Bill should not just forbid any other anti-gun laws from being passed anywhere, but should also include the following.
Section (A)
1. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state, and/or federal from restricting, forbid, regulating and/or deny any law abiding citizen from the purchasing, possession, and/or use of fire arms, of any type that is commonly available to law abiding citizen.
2. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state and/or federal, from restricting, or deny the purchase, possession, or use of Ammunition of the common type that is used by law-abiding citizens.
3. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether they be local, county, state, or federal, to close, remove, restrict, regulate, or forbid the legal ownership, and/or operation of shooting ranges whereby a law abiding citizen may enjoy, and/or use for the act of civilian marksmanship, and /or recreational shooting.
4. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state, and/or federal to stop, forbid, restrict, deny any law abiding weapons manufacturing business, from making, manufacturing, repairing, upgrading, selling legal firearms and/or ammunition to any legal law abiding citizens.
5. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state, and/or federal to redefine, change, and/or interpreting firearms, ammunition, and/or legal ranges, beyond what is here in this Amendment.
6. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state, and/or federal, from restricting, regulating, forbidding, denying any Law abiding Gun Shop from conducting legal sales of firearms, firearm accessories and/or Ammunition, to American citizens in any city, county, and/or state.
7. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state, and/or federal, from restricting, regulating, forbidding, denying any Law abiding citizen, law abiding business, or manufacturer, from producing, selling, buying, possessing, and/or using any high capacity feeding device for weapons.
8. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state, and/or federal, from restricting, regulating, forbidding, denying any Law abiding citizen, law abiding business, from importing weapons commonly used for self defense and/or recreational use.
9. There shall be no attempt by any group, and/or governing body whether local, county, state, and/or federal, from restricting, regulating, forbidding, denying any Law abiding citizen, the owning of weapons because of cosmetic appearances, or functionality.
Section (B)
Penalties for violations listed here in shall include but not limited to.
1. Fines of $100,000 U.S. per day that a violation is in effect by a city.
1a. Fines of $250,000 U.S. per day that a violation is in effect by a county.
1b. Fines of $1,000,000 U.S. per day that a violation is in effect by a state.
1c. Fines of $2,500,000 U.S. per day for violations by a government agency.
Note 1. If fines are not paid to victims of the violations with in 30 days of the start of the violation then said violating body will be subject to seizures of assets to sell off to pay for said fines.
Automatic forfeiture of citizenship, deportation and seizure of all assets for any person/s violating section (A)
Automatic disbanding and closure of violating government body, group, or organization that violates Section (A).
Automatic impeachment of persons who are elected to office for violating Section (A)
Charges of Treason against the American Constitution, country and peoples shall be livid against persons who are in violation of Section (A)
Life in prison without parole for violations of Section (A)
opaww
Monday, July 28, 2008
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Left or Right?
Sense the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Second Amendment right of the individual to own guns, and the legal use of them for protection and hunting, we have seen an outcry from the left side and some on the right. Many would have America believe that the 2nd Amendment is a collective right or that it applies to the military only.
Many left leaning newspapers have published their version of just what the 2nd Amendment should mean, (in their eyes). Many noted anti-gunners have come out and put their 2 cents worth into the fray with the continued ranting that it is for the military and not the individual citizen.
Again the pro-gun side has had to make a stand against such preposterous claims from the anti-freedom crowd. The war on the gun issues will never end, and the pro side needs to be ever vigilant and prepared. A good counter attack would do wanders right now for the pro-gun side if they would sound off by filing law suites and demanding Congress pass laws that are pro-gun in nature.
With Congress’s ever-ebbing popularity with the American people, we see such infighting, bickering, name calling, finger pointing, and even down right refusal to pass anything worth a dam to the American people. Satire follows, => (The left) I hate GWB so the war in iraq is illegal so I will not vote for funding. (The right) I believe that cloning body parts to help people with medical problems is wrong and playing GOD, so I won’t support it. (The Middle) Pro-gun bill, (Crickets chirping).
All in all I think Congress could get top billing as a soap opera on daytime T.V. If one takes a close look at Congress and the people we elect, you just might get a lot more entertainment from them then you do in today’s sappy soaps. Let us for the sake of argument just call the whole of the illicit acts of Congress and the white house, “Hog wollering”. A good term sense Congress is so full of pork, one would also think that peta (people for the ethical treatment of animals) would be all over Congress for the abuse of oinkers.
The job of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution and not create new meanings to be applied to them. Part of the job actually is to research these meaning in past written documents by the founders of our great country. Applying known and understood concepts, definitions, and meaning that were long thought to be true. This process is not suppose to be a party line belief but should be a non-biased look at all the data available and the outcome should reflect in the ruling.
How ever if we take another close look at the Supreme Courts rulings in the last 100 years we can see that the stacking of the Supreme Court to effect a political outcome has at least be practiced sense FDR was in office. If I were a liberal and wanted to eliminate private gun ownership in the U.S. I just simply appoint enough anti-American judges to the Supreme Court to effect the ruling I want. That is what FDR did with socialist security.
Though I am not completely happy with the Supreme Courts ruling in the D.C. vs. Hiller case. I am somewhat relieved that 5 of the Judges actually knew what the Second Amendment is about and made their ruling accordingly. Of course attempting to convince the socialists in America that the Supreme Court was right in the ruling is like beating your head against a brick wall.
Had the ruling gone the other way they would be celebrating and calling us true Americans all sorts of names and demanding that we turn in all our guns and submit ourselves to re-educational camps so that our task masters can drill out all the old misguided beliefs that never existed. The left would berate opinions regarding the old and outdated concept of private gun ownership or personal rights for that matter. The socialists in America would tell us to just get over it and move on, so with no further ado I say to the socialist anti-American/anti-gunners GET THE FUCK OVER IT AND MOVE OUT OF THIS GREAT NATION.
To everyone who is celebrating the ruling in the D.C. vs. Hiller I say to you that the socialists are also celebrating sense it left so many vagaries and left open the door for further restrictions on your rights. The time for Americans to wake up and smell the shit the socialists are trying to sell you is now or we just may never be able to recover from their trashing America and our freedoms.
opaww
This is my personal opinion and does not reflect the opinions of the socialists that currently leach in America.
Many left leaning newspapers have published their version of just what the 2nd Amendment should mean, (in their eyes). Many noted anti-gunners have come out and put their 2 cents worth into the fray with the continued ranting that it is for the military and not the individual citizen.
Again the pro-gun side has had to make a stand against such preposterous claims from the anti-freedom crowd. The war on the gun issues will never end, and the pro side needs to be ever vigilant and prepared. A good counter attack would do wanders right now for the pro-gun side if they would sound off by filing law suites and demanding Congress pass laws that are pro-gun in nature.
With Congress’s ever-ebbing popularity with the American people, we see such infighting, bickering, name calling, finger pointing, and even down right refusal to pass anything worth a dam to the American people. Satire follows, => (The left) I hate GWB so the war in iraq is illegal so I will not vote for funding. (The right) I believe that cloning body parts to help people with medical problems is wrong and playing GOD, so I won’t support it. (The Middle) Pro-gun bill, (Crickets chirping).
All in all I think Congress could get top billing as a soap opera on daytime T.V. If one takes a close look at Congress and the people we elect, you just might get a lot more entertainment from them then you do in today’s sappy soaps. Let us for the sake of argument just call the whole of the illicit acts of Congress and the white house, “Hog wollering”. A good term sense Congress is so full of pork, one would also think that peta (people for the ethical treatment of animals) would be all over Congress for the abuse of oinkers.
The job of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution and not create new meanings to be applied to them. Part of the job actually is to research these meaning in past written documents by the founders of our great country. Applying known and understood concepts, definitions, and meaning that were long thought to be true. This process is not suppose to be a party line belief but should be a non-biased look at all the data available and the outcome should reflect in the ruling.
How ever if we take another close look at the Supreme Courts rulings in the last 100 years we can see that the stacking of the Supreme Court to effect a political outcome has at least be practiced sense FDR was in office. If I were a liberal and wanted to eliminate private gun ownership in the U.S. I just simply appoint enough anti-American judges to the Supreme Court to effect the ruling I want. That is what FDR did with socialist security.
Though I am not completely happy with the Supreme Courts ruling in the D.C. vs. Hiller case. I am somewhat relieved that 5 of the Judges actually knew what the Second Amendment is about and made their ruling accordingly. Of course attempting to convince the socialists in America that the Supreme Court was right in the ruling is like beating your head against a brick wall.
Had the ruling gone the other way they would be celebrating and calling us true Americans all sorts of names and demanding that we turn in all our guns and submit ourselves to re-educational camps so that our task masters can drill out all the old misguided beliefs that never existed. The left would berate opinions regarding the old and outdated concept of private gun ownership or personal rights for that matter. The socialists in America would tell us to just get over it and move on, so with no further ado I say to the socialist anti-American/anti-gunners GET THE FUCK OVER IT AND MOVE OUT OF THIS GREAT NATION.
To everyone who is celebrating the ruling in the D.C. vs. Hiller I say to you that the socialists are also celebrating sense it left so many vagaries and left open the door for further restrictions on your rights. The time for Americans to wake up and smell the shit the socialists are trying to sell you is now or we just may never be able to recover from their trashing America and our freedoms.
opaww
This is my personal opinion and does not reflect the opinions of the socialists that currently leach in America.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)