Friday, July 10, 2009

Amices brief from 34 states Attorney Generals

As of right now there are 34 signatures on the Amices brief from 34 states Attorney Generals supporting the incorporation of the 14th amendment into the 2nd Amendment. One might think this is a good thing sense if the Supreme Court rules in favor of incorporation it will make each state the same. But really think about it, like an anti-gunner and see if it sounds so great.

With an incorporation of the 14th Amendment into the 2nd Amendment you now have all states that must abide by federal law and if the anti-gunners can get federal law passed restricting some form of gun control then each state will have to comply. Where if it is not incorporated then a state can tell the federal government to shove it.

Also consider this, that the Attorney General of commiefornia Jerry Brown has signed this brief in support of incorporation. Do not be so fast to say that Jerry Brown is a pro-gunner sense he has control of what is a legal firearm in commiefornia. The list of banned guns in commiefornia is longer then my arm, as the saying goes. So if an anti-gunner like Jerry Brown is supporting the incorporation then something must be wrong. Let us also consider that the brady bunch also wants this ruling of incorporation.

Let us not forget that the Scotus ruling in the case of Heller vs. D.C. was not the win that was spewed forth by some semi-pro-gun groups. It left the door open for reasonable restrictions with out actually defining these restrictions and anyone can say a total ban of everything but a S&W .22lr. Pistol is reasonable. Licensing of gun owners and each weapon can be considered reasonable in many eyes of socialism. This will depend on how the rulers in our governments see it; little input from the actual public will be almost nil.

With the miss guided Scotus ruling already in place, this ruling may just be the thing the anti-American/anti-gunners are waiting for. Largely because of the left undone and said of the Scotus ruling in Heller vs. D.C. With the 2nd Amendment stating, “Shall not infringe” and this meaning is quite clear to even a moron, we still have infringement being forced on us all the time under the guise of reasonable restrictions, and for public safety.

I see no place in the 2nd Amendment the authority to restrict this right in any way, shape, or form by any governing body whether it be local, county, state, or federal. I see no authority to allow reasonable restrictions for any cause at all. The issue of public safety is largely used as a form of authority to restrict a right that is absolute, when public safety has nothing to do with it. Weapons account for far less deaths and injuries then does Automobiles and yet automobiles are not protected by the Constitution. Also they are not under the over zealous attacks by the socialists in America.

Doctors have nearly a 12 to 1 ratio of accidental deaths compared to accidental gun deaths every year. But we don’t see the socialists screaming about banning Doctors. Auto’s have a ratio of 2 to 1 but we don’t see the over zealous cry by the socialists for their outright ban. If the socialists can affect a total ban on private weapons then I believe that all forms of private transportation will become their next target.

opaww

Monday, July 6, 2009

False arrest

While reading, and thinking about what may or may not happen with our government regarding the outlook of it turning socialist and un-American I came away with another impression. This being just as dangerous to the American people as anything else.

False arrest under the pretence of falsified information, say you are an outspoken appoint of osamaobama and his ill begotten socialists in our government (I don’t know anyone who would do this though) and they want to put a muzzle on you. All that is required is for someone to say you need to be shut up. The feds take the ball from there and with the aid of the socialist supporting news media you will be found to be anything from a child molester to an out right white supremacy and maybe everything else in between.

Never having done anything more then voice your opinion and beliefs. If you are not shot and killing in the raid to quite you, you will be jailed without bond possibly and this amounts to guilty until proven innocent. Most of us little people have not the money to hire a high priced lawyer let alone even a lawyer of any type to defend us. In essence we will go to jail regardless, effectively muzzling any opposition speech.

The ability to get a fair trial will be null sense the socialist news media has all but proven your guilt to the world and most people will believe them without a second thought. Along with the very liberal socialist judges in place already I just don’t feel comfortable with getting set free.

This being a very real threat to freedom loving Americans we now can invision a use for the 200+ concentration camps (that we don’t have in America). Like many dictators of the past and present many people who are considered opposition just simply disappear never to heard from again. This socialist dictator in office will be no deferent, it just may take him a second term in office before he gets real pissy toward our rights to free speech.

Though some may view this as tin hat stuff or just won’t happen, it has a surreal feel to it and should not be taken lightly. Most times we ourselves will simply see it happening right in front of our noses. We have become complacent in listening to the news media and saying to ourselves that they must of done something wrong, why else would they have 50 armed men in full tactical gear to arrest this one person and 5 black helicopters flying over head?

This makes me look back to such incidents as Waco, Ruby Ridge and wander. Not wanting to be a conspiracy theorist with regard to these two situations, but if memory serves me right the news media had already sliced and diced them to the public before the shooting started.

With every arrest of any suspected criminal we have the news media perching on the bandwagon about the virtues and need for his arrest. As I see and listen to them flap their mouths off of just how bad this guy is the last thing we hear from them is a sarcastic remark about them possibly being innocent until a court says deferent.
So why even extol the virtues of this persons arrest if you do not know his guilt nor can absolutely prove his involvement in the act you say he is? I would have to say that it boils down to a socialist view by the news media, which is to lend credence to their want for power over the tiny American slaves.

opaww

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Senate Bill Would Fine People More Than $1,000 for Refusing Health Care Coverage

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/02/senate-democrats-trim-cost-health-care/

The most resent release of the socialist health care by our government call for mandatory participation or be subject to a $1000 fine each year you don’t have the socialist health care. This bill may just pass sense we have a vast majority of socialists in congress.