While Nero played his lyre as he watched Rome burn in 64 A.D. whispers of his involvement were circulating shortly after. Seemingly Nero needing something to draw attention away from him, so the creation of a scapegoat fell to the Christians and many were rounded up and burnt at the stake for nothing more then being the whipping boys of Nero.
Nero seemingly catered to the lower classes of people during his reign of terror or power, whichever way one wants to look at it. Being very popular among the less fortunate and the working class of people he enjoyed popularity and was likened to being a God among them.
This allowed him to get away with much that normally would of ended in a very short reign of power and sudden death syndrome, which occurred often in the days of Rome.
Nero was one of the most corrupt and perverse Emperors to cross Rome, building an extravagant pleasure palace that had no rival. Labor was provided by forced and slave labor. The rich and/or well off were taxed heavily and most times to the point of everything they owned, then they were killed along with their families.
Make no mistake Nero by all accounts would of made a perfect liberal, democratic, socialist in our time. The comparison with Nero and today’s liberal, democratic, socialist is nothing less then uncanny.
While we have yet to see America burn, the comparison is still true. During the Watts riots in the 60’s we saw many stores and houses burnt to the ground. The L.A. riots during the 90’s saw fires all over the place. But nothing as of this time that could be likened to Rome during Nero’s reign.
Could a great fire that kills countless people and destroys billions of dollars of property happen in America? Yes it could if something dramatic happened to light the match, and the peoples were disarmed so they could not protect what is theirs, (commiefornia).
Could we see the heavy taxation of the rich and well off in America? Yes we can and we can see the desire to take from them in the very things our liberal, democratic, socialists are trying to do, and through the very words they spew forth with seemingly justifiable reasons they can create.
Could we see the execution of the rich/well off and their families? Not yet but as with anything fanatical liberals do it is possible. With the cat calls of the liberal, democratic, socialists in America to round up anyone who speaks out against them and/or can be accused of some form of hate speech this could be a clarion sign of the first step in mass murder of innocent American peoples. Kind of like the Jews during the socialist Hitler’s reign.
Will the liberal, democratic, socialists find something or someone to use as a scapegoat? They already do that if we just look at the anti-gun, anti-Christian, anti-right wing, anti-free speech rhetoric they pervert and spray out their cesspools for lips, one can see the use of an inanimate object and/or persons as our current day Nero’s scapegoat. Maybe just maybe it is not the object so much as it is the Second Amendment and/or the entire Bill of Rights that is actually the current day whipping boy of our Nero.
To clarify that our current day Nero is not an individual as was the Nero of Rome, but rather socialism which is more dangerous then a single individual sense it has many heads with many throats that would need to be cut to rid us of such a nasty beast. Though the socialists will say this is hate speech calling for the killing of their own kind, it is nothing more then a comparison.
During the reign of Nero in Rome if anyone spoke out against him or any of his laws they were quickly rounded up and executed. We can see the same desire with the socialists calling for the rounding up of anyone who uses some form of speech that the socialists want to call hate speech.
Just because I speak out against some form of treasoness policy, law, or person does not make it hate speech. Because I choose to not support or believe in a given political elitist does not make me a hate monger. Because I may choose to make a satire of a famous person does not make me a hate monger either. Regardless of what anyone wants to force me to believe I can and will hate and express it at my discretion and not yours. This is my right as a human being and you have only two choices. Like it or not you can, 1. STFU and go away or, 2. Shoot and kill, either way I don’t have to put up with you.
I am sure that we can find many more comparisons to Nero of Rome and our current day Nero of America, but in reality they are boring, not to mention full of dung up past their ears.
opaww
Friday, June 19, 2009
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
"The Police Have the Power to Suspend Your Rights"
You can read the post here at this link...I would look for this to happen more often in other parts of the U.S. This is a way of controlling people and if they can demand and get the public to believe it and not make a stand, this will become the norm in almost every city in America. People of LA. don't let this shit head get away with it, and the rest of the U.S for that matter.
http://waronguns.blogspot.com/
So says Shreveport, LA mayor Cedric Glover.Listen to Part A of Tom Gresham's "Gun Talk" for Sun, 14 June 2009, featuring guest Robert Baillio.
The page to access podcasts is here. http://guntalk.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=491553
Then when you're done, you might consider telling Cedric what you think of his unique view of the social compact. mayor@shreveportla.gov
I would also advise everyone to contact the Governor of LA. and exspress their displeasure with this and ask him to look into it.
http://www.gov.la.gov/index.cfm?md=form&tmp=email_governor
http://waronguns.blogspot.com/
So says Shreveport, LA mayor Cedric Glover.Listen to Part A of Tom Gresham's "Gun Talk" for Sun, 14 June 2009, featuring guest Robert Baillio.
The page to access podcasts is here. http://guntalk.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=491553
Then when you're done, you might consider telling Cedric what you think of his unique view of the social compact. mayor@shreveportla.gov
I would also advise everyone to contact the Governor of LA. and exspress their displeasure with this and ask him to look into it.
http://www.gov.la.gov/index.cfm?md=form&tmp=email_governor
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Right Wing Extremists
Recently the DHS published a list of possible home grown terrorists, sighting such ridicules clames as Libertarians, returning Veterans from the iraq war, Republicans, people who are against abortion, people who are anti-illegal aliens, members of the Militias, and many more classes of people who just believe differently then the kool-aid drinking crowd.
The list has a very bad undertone to it, because it places almost every true American on the list of potential terrorists, making even speech against government policies and/or people a threat. Some place close to 40% of the listed groups are simply right wing believers. This is an indication of a true Nazi regime starting toward raring its ugly head.
If you really dig deep you can find that this trend is nothing more then a way to control the massive indigenes sheep in this country. By placing fear in their minds and harts. Liberals have and are behind this cesspool of demented thinking. When Raciest/terrorism is deeply imbedded in the liberals throughout our history.
The founder of the KKK was a democrat and democrats are liberals, most of the member of the KKK were democrats. Left leaning democrats are for the most part supporters of socialism; Hitler was a believer in socialism. This guy who killed a security guard in the Holocaust museum was a socialist not a right wing nut like some are trying to make everyone believe.
For the most part most democratic liberals are against free speech making them the actual terrorists in America. If you do not support the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as it is then you are a terrorists. The infamous Bobby Rush former leader of the terrorist group the Chicago Black Panthers wants to take away American rights lock stock and barrel making him a prominent terrorist and anti-American/freedom ass wipe.
The slime bags that wants to close down my web site and/or Blog because I don’t sing Kumbaya and hold hands with my glorious leader osamaobama are nothing more then terrorists. They would have me arrested and shipped by rail in cattle cars to re-educational camps for an attitude adjustment. (Execution by gas chamber sense it can handle more potential anti-socialists at a time.)
Let us just see whom this might be that would round us up and move us out. Maybe someone like Bonnie Erbe http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2009/06/11/round-up-hate-promoters-now-before-any-more-holocaust-museum-attacks.html because I don’t suck up to her ass spewing anti-American beliefs. Could it maybe be Janet Reno? No wait she would just have you killed in your own home instead of waist money transporting you some place else.
Erbe is nothing more then wasted trash of the left leaning socialists in America that are dragging this country into another civil war that will rival all to of existed.
The list has a very bad undertone to it, because it places almost every true American on the list of potential terrorists, making even speech against government policies and/or people a threat. Some place close to 40% of the listed groups are simply right wing believers. This is an indication of a true Nazi regime starting toward raring its ugly head.
If you really dig deep you can find that this trend is nothing more then a way to control the massive indigenes sheep in this country. By placing fear in their minds and harts. Liberals have and are behind this cesspool of demented thinking. When Raciest/terrorism is deeply imbedded in the liberals throughout our history.
The founder of the KKK was a democrat and democrats are liberals, most of the member of the KKK were democrats. Left leaning democrats are for the most part supporters of socialism; Hitler was a believer in socialism. This guy who killed a security guard in the Holocaust museum was a socialist not a right wing nut like some are trying to make everyone believe.
For the most part most democratic liberals are against free speech making them the actual terrorists in America. If you do not support the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as it is then you are a terrorists. The infamous Bobby Rush former leader of the terrorist group the Chicago Black Panthers wants to take away American rights lock stock and barrel making him a prominent terrorist and anti-American/freedom ass wipe.
The slime bags that wants to close down my web site and/or Blog because I don’t sing Kumbaya and hold hands with my glorious leader osamaobama are nothing more then terrorists. They would have me arrested and shipped by rail in cattle cars to re-educational camps for an attitude adjustment. (Execution by gas chamber sense it can handle more potential anti-socialists at a time.)
Let us just see whom this might be that would round us up and move us out. Maybe someone like Bonnie Erbe http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2009/06/11/round-up-hate-promoters-now-before-any-more-holocaust-museum-attacks.html because I don’t suck up to her ass spewing anti-American beliefs. Could it maybe be Janet Reno? No wait she would just have you killed in your own home instead of waist money transporting you some place else.
Erbe is nothing more then wasted trash of the left leaning socialists in America that are dragging this country into another civil war that will rival all to of existed.
Friday, June 12, 2009
This Piece of shit Sonia Sotomayor is dead wrong in her belief and ruling that the 14th Amendment is not incorporated into the Second Amendment.
If you look at the history of the Second Amendment as being part of the Bill of Rights then you find that it is an individual right, sense the Bill of Rights was written for the individuals and restrictions of the government from restricting the rights listed there in.
If we look at Amendment 1 it tells us that Congress shall make no law, not the state. So this being a order to congress forbidding congress from making laws restricting religion, freedom of speech, the press; the right of the people peaceably to assemble, petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment had to have the protection of the 14th Amendment along with other Amendments in order to keep states from instituting their own laws.
The Second Amendment; A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Nowhere in this Amendment are there any restrictions of just the Federal Government. Quite the contrary it alone applies to any and all governing bodies, local, county, State, and Federal. How can this be so one might ask? Well first it says the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. There is no mention of a restriction of a specific governing entity, but rather forbids any governing body from in acting infringements. Secondly the purpose was a well regulated Militia, and just what is a well regulated Militia?
Title 10, Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 13, Section 311 of the United States Code defines the Militia thusly: § 311. Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
This provides for the states to recognize and support (Non monetarily) a citizen Army to be called and directed by the Governor of each and every state. Which is not under the direction or authority of the Federal Government. The soul purpose of a Militia is to provide for the defense of the state, county, and city in which we live. There actions are governed by the Governor, then the sheriff, and lastly the chief of Police in their town. The Militia does not fall under the jurisdiction or authority of the federal Government in any way shape or form. To do so would make them just another federal controlled Army, and that is not the intent of each state to form its own Militias.
The National Guard was in the beginning an answer to the need for a Militia of the States, but as with most things the Federal Government usurped its authority and instituted authority and control over the National Guard. If you look the National Guard is under the Direction of the Governor, until the Federal Government has a need for them then they become a federal Army not covered by the Militia clause of the Second Amendment.
Contrary to miss conceived notions that the National Guard is the Militia among the Anti-freedom/anti-gunners the National Guard is National as it is stated in their name. The Militia is state only and is not subject to the powers of a corrupt federal Government.
As is provided by the laws governing the Militia one must be equipped with personal weapons and ammunitions that they must provide out of their own pockets. The State has no obligation to provide this along with other essensuals to the Militia. A State may if they feel the need and monetary fund permit can offer some supplies if the need arises.
Thusly we can see that the Militia as is referred to in the Second Amendment is a state formed and controlled entity. Making the Second Amendment applicable to the states as well and Federal Government.
In synopsis we can see that;
The second Amendment applies to the individual person in that it provides for the right of the people, not the right of the elite.
That the Militia as is referred to in the Second Amendment is made up of the individual person and they must provide their own arms and ammunition.
That the Militia is exclusively state Governed and at no time a part of any Federal body.
That the National guard is not the Militia because they can and are call upon by the Federal Government to be used outside the state and/or country to fight wars.
Now lastly a small part we have not covered; being necessary to the security of a free State. When referring to the individual State it was called the free State, or the several States. This was an implication of individuality among the State to be governed by such rule or law. Making the application of the Second Amendment a direct order against infringement by the State, and/or any Governing body regardless of whom it is.
The Second Amendment applies to any and all governments and need no 14th Amendment to protect it or incorporate it into the state. Sonia Sotomayor and her piece of shit collogues are dead wrong in their belief that the second Amendment does not apply to the State and the State/city can make their own laws restricting this God Given Right.
opaww
If you look at the history of the Second Amendment as being part of the Bill of Rights then you find that it is an individual right, sense the Bill of Rights was written for the individuals and restrictions of the government from restricting the rights listed there in.
If we look at Amendment 1 it tells us that Congress shall make no law, not the state. So this being a order to congress forbidding congress from making laws restricting religion, freedom of speech, the press; the right of the people peaceably to assemble, petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment had to have the protection of the 14th Amendment along with other Amendments in order to keep states from instituting their own laws.
The Second Amendment; A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Nowhere in this Amendment are there any restrictions of just the Federal Government. Quite the contrary it alone applies to any and all governing bodies, local, county, State, and Federal. How can this be so one might ask? Well first it says the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. There is no mention of a restriction of a specific governing entity, but rather forbids any governing body from in acting infringements. Secondly the purpose was a well regulated Militia, and just what is a well regulated Militia?
Title 10, Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 13, Section 311 of the United States Code defines the Militia thusly: § 311. Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
This provides for the states to recognize and support (Non monetarily) a citizen Army to be called and directed by the Governor of each and every state. Which is not under the direction or authority of the Federal Government. The soul purpose of a Militia is to provide for the defense of the state, county, and city in which we live. There actions are governed by the Governor, then the sheriff, and lastly the chief of Police in their town. The Militia does not fall under the jurisdiction or authority of the federal Government in any way shape or form. To do so would make them just another federal controlled Army, and that is not the intent of each state to form its own Militias.
The National Guard was in the beginning an answer to the need for a Militia of the States, but as with most things the Federal Government usurped its authority and instituted authority and control over the National Guard. If you look the National Guard is under the Direction of the Governor, until the Federal Government has a need for them then they become a federal Army not covered by the Militia clause of the Second Amendment.
Contrary to miss conceived notions that the National Guard is the Militia among the Anti-freedom/anti-gunners the National Guard is National as it is stated in their name. The Militia is state only and is not subject to the powers of a corrupt federal Government.
As is provided by the laws governing the Militia one must be equipped with personal weapons and ammunitions that they must provide out of their own pockets. The State has no obligation to provide this along with other essensuals to the Militia. A State may if they feel the need and monetary fund permit can offer some supplies if the need arises.
Thusly we can see that the Militia as is referred to in the Second Amendment is a state formed and controlled entity. Making the Second Amendment applicable to the states as well and Federal Government.
In synopsis we can see that;
The second Amendment applies to the individual person in that it provides for the right of the people, not the right of the elite.
That the Militia as is referred to in the Second Amendment is made up of the individual person and they must provide their own arms and ammunition.
That the Militia is exclusively state Governed and at no time a part of any Federal body.
That the National guard is not the Militia because they can and are call upon by the Federal Government to be used outside the state and/or country to fight wars.
Now lastly a small part we have not covered; being necessary to the security of a free State. When referring to the individual State it was called the free State, or the several States. This was an implication of individuality among the State to be governed by such rule or law. Making the application of the Second Amendment a direct order against infringement by the State, and/or any Governing body regardless of whom it is.
The Second Amendment applies to any and all governments and need no 14th Amendment to protect it or incorporate it into the state. Sonia Sotomayor and her piece of shit collogues are dead wrong in their belief that the second Amendment does not apply to the State and the State/city can make their own laws restricting this God Given Right.
opaww
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
The Spy In your hand
http://www.newsweek.com/id/200878
Don't talk: your cell phone may be eavesdropping. Thanks to recent developments in "spy phone" software, a do-it-yourself spook can now wirelessly transfer a wiretapping program to any mobile phone. The programs are inexpensive, and the transfer requires no special skill. The would-be spy needs to get his hands on your phone to press keys authorizing the download, but it takes just a few minutes—about the time needed to download a ringtone.
This new generation of -user-friendly spy-phone software has become widely available in the last year—and it confers stunning powers. The latest programs can silently turn on handset microphones even when no call is being made, allowing a spy to listen to voices in a room halfway around the world. Targets are none the wiser: neither call logs nor phone bills show records of the secretly transmitted data.
More than 200 companies sell spy-phone software online, at prices as low as $50 (a few programs cost more than $300). Vendors are loath to release sales figures. But some experts—private investigators and consultants in counter-wiretapping, computer-security software and telecommunications market research—claim that a surprising number of people carry a mobile that has been compromised, usually by a spouse, lover, parent or co-worker. Many employees, experts say, hope to discover a supervisor's dishonest dealings and tip off the top boss anonymously. Max Maiellaro, head of Agata Christie Investigation, a private-investigation firm in Milan, estimates that 3 percent of mobiles in France and Germany are tapped, and about 5 percent or so in Greece, Italy, Romania and Spain. James Atkinson, a spy-phone expert at Granite Island Group, a security consultancy in Gloucester, Massachusetts, puts the number of tapped phones in the U.S. at 3 percent. (These approximations do not take into account government wiretapping.) Even if these numbers are inflated, clearly many otherwise law-abiding citizens are willing to break wiretapping laws.
Spyware thrives on iPhones, BlackBerrys and other smart phones because they have ample processing power. In the United States, the spread of GSM networks, which are more vulnerable than older technologies, has also enlarged the pool of potential victims. Spyware being developed for law-enforcement agencies will accompany a text message and automatically install itself in the victim's phone when the message is opened, according to an Italian developer who declined to be identified. One worry is that the software will find its way into the hands of criminals.
The current predicament is partly the result of decisions by Apple, Microsoft and Research In Motion (producer of the BlackBerry) to open their phones to outside application-software developers, which created the opening for spyware. Antivirus and security programs developed for computers require too much processing power, even for smart phones. Although security programs are available for phones, by and large users haven't given the threat much thought. If the spying keeps spreading, that may change soon.
Don't talk: your cell phone may be eavesdropping. Thanks to recent developments in "spy phone" software, a do-it-yourself spook can now wirelessly transfer a wiretapping program to any mobile phone. The programs are inexpensive, and the transfer requires no special skill. The would-be spy needs to get his hands on your phone to press keys authorizing the download, but it takes just a few minutes—about the time needed to download a ringtone.
This new generation of -user-friendly spy-phone software has become widely available in the last year—and it confers stunning powers. The latest programs can silently turn on handset microphones even when no call is being made, allowing a spy to listen to voices in a room halfway around the world. Targets are none the wiser: neither call logs nor phone bills show records of the secretly transmitted data.
More than 200 companies sell spy-phone software online, at prices as low as $50 (a few programs cost more than $300). Vendors are loath to release sales figures. But some experts—private investigators and consultants in counter-wiretapping, computer-security software and telecommunications market research—claim that a surprising number of people carry a mobile that has been compromised, usually by a spouse, lover, parent or co-worker. Many employees, experts say, hope to discover a supervisor's dishonest dealings and tip off the top boss anonymously. Max Maiellaro, head of Agata Christie Investigation, a private-investigation firm in Milan, estimates that 3 percent of mobiles in France and Germany are tapped, and about 5 percent or so in Greece, Italy, Romania and Spain. James Atkinson, a spy-phone expert at Granite Island Group, a security consultancy in Gloucester, Massachusetts, puts the number of tapped phones in the U.S. at 3 percent. (These approximations do not take into account government wiretapping.) Even if these numbers are inflated, clearly many otherwise law-abiding citizens are willing to break wiretapping laws.
Spyware thrives on iPhones, BlackBerrys and other smart phones because they have ample processing power. In the United States, the spread of GSM networks, which are more vulnerable than older technologies, has also enlarged the pool of potential victims. Spyware being developed for law-enforcement agencies will accompany a text message and automatically install itself in the victim's phone when the message is opened, according to an Italian developer who declined to be identified. One worry is that the software will find its way into the hands of criminals.
The current predicament is partly the result of decisions by Apple, Microsoft and Research In Motion (producer of the BlackBerry) to open their phones to outside application-software developers, which created the opening for spyware. Antivirus and security programs developed for computers require too much processing power, even for smart phones. Although security programs are available for phones, by and large users haven't given the threat much thought. If the spying keeps spreading, that may change soon.
Saturday, May 30, 2009
U.N. sanctions
When I hear about how the U.N. is going to institute sanctions against a piece of shit ruler of another country I get this vision of Monty Python and the Holy Grail scene where the French tell the King and his knights to go away or they will taunt him a second time. The King and his knights being the U.N. and the French being which ruler they are going to sanction.
Saddam Hussein comes to mind after the first gulf war where the U.N. had instituted some 19 deferent sanctions against him and he still just taunted them a second time. Now we have a half-baked ball-licking runt in North Korea who is taunting the U.N. a second time. I just wander if it will reach 19 times like Saddam. I think this socialist administration that we are forced to put up with will do nothing except appeasement because they don’t want to be taunted a second time.
Saddam Hussein comes to mind after the first gulf war where the U.N. had instituted some 19 deferent sanctions against him and he still just taunted them a second time. Now we have a half-baked ball-licking runt in North Korea who is taunting the U.N. a second time. I just wander if it will reach 19 times like Saddam. I think this socialist administration that we are forced to put up with will do nothing except appeasement because they don’t want to be taunted a second time.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)