I tend to think that Eric Holder will be The worst enemy of Americans in the history of the American government. Once affirmed as U.S. Attorney General. He will be given broad powers to decide what types, calibers, functionality, cosmetic appearances, and capacities of weapons we may be allowed to own. This power will first come from the president as an executive order, which is law regardless of the Supreme Court. As a stopgap until formal laws can be instituted through Congress. (As the will of the people) and (for your own good).
He will establish a registration and licensing of all weapons and peoples owning them. He will sit up a harsh ammo-buying program where gun owners will have to register for each box of ammo, and each bullet will be serial numbered and accounted for in the box.
He will do this under the guise of we are still allowing you your rights as the Supreme Court says. But we are placing reasonable restrictions IAW the Supreme Court. Most of the banned weapons on his list will be semi-auto loading weapons at first. Sense he will class them as assault weapons and not needed to hunt with. Surprisingly or maybe not so surprisingly the first list he produces will look a hell of a lot like the list in the H.R.1022. Some bolt actions will be added to the list a little bit later, sense they are sniper rifles and we just don’t need that types of military weapons.
He will slip in the ban on armor piercing ammo, which he will proceed to list most of the common rounds used for hunting and long range target shooting. On his list of calibers he will ban will also include any size .30 cal and above. He will over ride any state law regarding carry concealed and forbid it all together except for LEA’s.
At first Holder will place in action laws requiring you to store all weapons in approved storage containers (gun safes) in your home. There will be a grandfather clause allowing you to keep what you got for the time being. But look for that to change within a year of his first ban going into effect.
In order to enforce this the president will give a broader power to the Gestapo (BATFU) to over see and insure that American slaves are in compliance and they will not need any warrants to open your door at home to enter anytime they please to check. After all if you’re a law-abiding citizen you have nothing to fear.
Holder is counted among one of the biggest pieces of shit on the face of the earth.
opaww
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Friday, January 9, 2009
Osamaobama’s cabinet #3
Billery Klinton is no stranger to interpretation our rights to mean what she wants them to mean. As then president klinton’s not so main squeeze, and long before she had ideas of just how to revamp our rights. One thing she was very found of was the idea of government raising your children for you.
The early belief of that all children should be removed from the home and raised in a government facility was one of her core beliefs. Later this turned in to the “it takes a whole village to raise a child.” (Hers excluded) This was less scary of a proposal sense it seemed to mean your child would be close at hand, but don’t bet on it.
Her disdain for private gun owner ship is nothing less then disrespect for our rights all together. Her extreme socialist views like taking things from you for your own good is paramount to declaring all citizens as subservient to the elite in society.
opaww
The early belief of that all children should be removed from the home and raised in a government facility was one of her core beliefs. Later this turned in to the “it takes a whole village to raise a child.” (Hers excluded) This was less scary of a proposal sense it seemed to mean your child would be close at hand, but don’t bet on it.
Her disdain for private gun owner ship is nothing less then disrespect for our rights all together. Her extreme socialist views like taking things from you for your own good is paramount to declaring all citizens as subservient to the elite in society.
opaww
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Osamaobama’s cabinet #2
Commissar biden has never been a friend of gun owners at all, He supports one of the worst voting records in gun rights to come along in many long years. This chicken shit would not even join our military and do his duty to our country. I just wander how he avoided the draft to begin with.
Let us not even look at how he believes about the rest of the bill of rights should or should not apply to the rest of us low life’s. Here is but a sample of his past voting record on gun issues.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Joe_Biden.htm
Keep assault weapons ban; close gun show loophole. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. (Jul 2005)
Voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence. (Mar 2004)
Voted YES on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted NO on more penalties for gun & drug violations. (May 1999)
Voted NO on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted NO on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. (Jul 1998)
Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record. (Dec 2003)
But sense biden is a product of the politburo No Political Leach Left Behind we are now stuck with this shit bag for at least 4 years as vice president. There is one good thing we can say about this human waist and it is at least he did not vote present for 90% of the things he had to vote on.
Let us not even look at how he believes about the rest of the bill of rights should or should not apply to the rest of us low life’s. Here is but a sample of his past voting record on gun issues.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Joe_Biden.htm
Keep assault weapons ban; close gun show loophole. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. (Jul 2005)
Voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence. (Mar 2004)
Voted YES on background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted NO on more penalties for gun & drug violations. (May 1999)
Voted NO on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. (May 1999)
Voted NO on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. (Jul 1998)
Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record. (Dec 2003)
But sense biden is a product of the politburo No Political Leach Left Behind we are now stuck with this shit bag for at least 4 years as vice president. There is one good thing we can say about this human waist and it is at least he did not vote present for 90% of the things he had to vote on.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
osamaobama’s Cabinet
Looking over the names of the members of osamaobama’s cabinet I see a lot of trouble in the near future for Gun Owners, and some rights in general. I will list them and explain why I feel this way.
President = osamaobama, well we know his stance on peoples rights to keep and bar arms. And that is you don’t have a right. All the way up to the Supreme Court ruling osamaobama was against any form of private gun ownership except for the elite and rich. Some of his early Dog doo-doo spewing forth from his mouth was such things as “total ban on all hand guns, assault weapons and large bore rifles.
These large bore rifles were any that had the power to penetrate a bullet proof vest of LEA’s which included just about ever rifle round that exists. He supported the complete ban on all semi-auto, pump action, and lever action weapons. The only thing he openly would allow us peasant to even come close to owning was single shot, double barreled, or bolt actions with limited capacity of rounds.
These weapons that the Messiah would allow us low life’s in his society would have to be kept in a Government armory. No not a Government approved storage container in your home, but a real Government Armory that would be placed at conspicuous points within a state and if you wanted to and could afford the ammo plus had the blessings of his majesty osamaobama could go there and check out the weapon, take it to the range and shoot it. This included any of the banned weapons that were owned prior to his ban taking place.
Not one weapon was to be kept in the home, and surly not on the person or in your car. You say But-But I can’t find any of this on his web site!!! So you must be wrong, because he said he supports the Second Amendment. No I am not wrong, and you cannot find any of this on his web site not sense the Heller decision. Nor can you find any video footage of the things he said to the news reporters on this same subject. That is because osamaobama is the messiah and has the power to make thing disappear just as he can do to you.
We will talk about this further tomorrow and start on hidenbiden.
opaww
President = osamaobama, well we know his stance on peoples rights to keep and bar arms. And that is you don’t have a right. All the way up to the Supreme Court ruling osamaobama was against any form of private gun ownership except for the elite and rich. Some of his early Dog doo-doo spewing forth from his mouth was such things as “total ban on all hand guns, assault weapons and large bore rifles.
These large bore rifles were any that had the power to penetrate a bullet proof vest of LEA’s which included just about ever rifle round that exists. He supported the complete ban on all semi-auto, pump action, and lever action weapons. The only thing he openly would allow us peasant to even come close to owning was single shot, double barreled, or bolt actions with limited capacity of rounds.
These weapons that the Messiah would allow us low life’s in his society would have to be kept in a Government armory. No not a Government approved storage container in your home, but a real Government Armory that would be placed at conspicuous points within a state and if you wanted to and could afford the ammo plus had the blessings of his majesty osamaobama could go there and check out the weapon, take it to the range and shoot it. This included any of the banned weapons that were owned prior to his ban taking place.
Not one weapon was to be kept in the home, and surly not on the person or in your car. You say But-But I can’t find any of this on his web site!!! So you must be wrong, because he said he supports the Second Amendment. No I am not wrong, and you cannot find any of this on his web site not sense the Heller decision. Nor can you find any video footage of the things he said to the news reporters on this same subject. That is because osamaobama is the messiah and has the power to make thing disappear just as he can do to you.
We will talk about this further tomorrow and start on hidenbiden.
opaww
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
'Assault Rifle Ban Would Enhance Rights . . . '
I would like to draw your attention to a fine Blog by 45superman at his Blog site Armed and Safe concerning New Jersey Polite Burrow's un-American Activity's. Take some time and have a good read at his Blog. If you like what he says book mark his Blog and post a reply letting him know.
Oppsition to Eric Holder As Attorney General
Right now is the time to send letters to your Senators regarding your opposition to the Nomination of Eric Holder as the United States Attorney General? The Conformation hearing for commissar holder starts in 15 Jan. Time is running out, so if you just can not think of what to say use the form letter I sent and posted here below to send to your Senator.
Dear Senator McConnell
As you are no doubt well aware, the Senate will soon be tasked with determining the suitability of President-elect Obama's choice of Eric Holder for United States Attorney General. Frankly, I would have difficulty imagining a less suitable choice, and I urge you in the strongest possible terms to refuse to confirm his appointment.
As Deputy Attorney General in the Clinton administration, Mr. Holder played a significant role in securing the presidential pardon of billionaire financier Marc Rich, whose tax evasion crimes constitute nothing less than theft, on a massive scale, from the American people. Some dismiss Mr. Holder's role in that pardon as nothing more than obedience to former President Clinton's quite legal (if extremely ill-advised and distasteful) prerogative, but the evidence points to Mr. Holder having played a large part in the pardon*.
Perhaps even worse is the prominent role Mr. Holder played in the granting of clemency to sixteen FALN terrorists. In an era when Americans face nearly unprecedented danger from terrorists, it would be the height of madness to entrust the Department of Justice to a man with anything less than a relentless drive to hunt down and stop every violent, radical extremist who threatens the safety, and indeed the very lives, of American citizens.
In the trying days that lie ahead, the United States will certainly need an Attorney General with vastly better judgment than can be counted on from Eric Holder. Senator McConnell, as your constituent, I urge you to fulfill your responsibility as a United States Senator, and block this dangerous appointment. Failure to do so would be an inexcusable dereliction of your duty to the American people. History never looks kindly on such failings.
These are but a few of my concerns in the nomination of Eric Holder for United States Attorney General, other include but not limited to His extreme Anti-Gun stance, The possible involvement in the Waco cover up, and a possible connection to a cover up of a death related to the Oklahoma City Federal building Bombing. Though some of it may be speculation, it places the American people at an uneasy feeling toward Eric Holder.
* "Pardon is Back in Focus for the Justice Nominee," New York Times, Dec. 1, 2008
Thank you,
opaww
Use your real name I just put opaww there sense it is what I go by. Now you may ask why I did not use the Gun Rights issue in this letter? Well quite frankly the Senate hearing comity is vastly anti gun, so they will over look any mention of gun rights related to the approval of any of osamaobama's appointees. The need to show other reasons they can identify with and support is why there is only a small mention of guns as a concern in the last paragraph.
Not to take away from 45superman his due recognition, he pinned this letter which I found to be very well written. I only added the last paragraph to it. It is posted for others to use here on my Blog and on 45superman's Blog.
Dear Senator McConnell
As you are no doubt well aware, the Senate will soon be tasked with determining the suitability of President-elect Obama's choice of Eric Holder for United States Attorney General. Frankly, I would have difficulty imagining a less suitable choice, and I urge you in the strongest possible terms to refuse to confirm his appointment.
As Deputy Attorney General in the Clinton administration, Mr. Holder played a significant role in securing the presidential pardon of billionaire financier Marc Rich, whose tax evasion crimes constitute nothing less than theft, on a massive scale, from the American people. Some dismiss Mr. Holder's role in that pardon as nothing more than obedience to former President Clinton's quite legal (if extremely ill-advised and distasteful) prerogative, but the evidence points to Mr. Holder having played a large part in the pardon*.
Perhaps even worse is the prominent role Mr. Holder played in the granting of clemency to sixteen FALN terrorists. In an era when Americans face nearly unprecedented danger from terrorists, it would be the height of madness to entrust the Department of Justice to a man with anything less than a relentless drive to hunt down and stop every violent, radical extremist who threatens the safety, and indeed the very lives, of American citizens.
In the trying days that lie ahead, the United States will certainly need an Attorney General with vastly better judgment than can be counted on from Eric Holder. Senator McConnell, as your constituent, I urge you to fulfill your responsibility as a United States Senator, and block this dangerous appointment. Failure to do so would be an inexcusable dereliction of your duty to the American people. History never looks kindly on such failings.
These are but a few of my concerns in the nomination of Eric Holder for United States Attorney General, other include but not limited to His extreme Anti-Gun stance, The possible involvement in the Waco cover up, and a possible connection to a cover up of a death related to the Oklahoma City Federal building Bombing. Though some of it may be speculation, it places the American people at an uneasy feeling toward Eric Holder.
* "Pardon is Back in Focus for the Justice Nominee," New York Times, Dec. 1, 2008
Thank you,
opaww
Use your real name I just put opaww there sense it is what I go by. Now you may ask why I did not use the Gun Rights issue in this letter? Well quite frankly the Senate hearing comity is vastly anti gun, so they will over look any mention of gun rights related to the approval of any of osamaobama's appointees. The need to show other reasons they can identify with and support is why there is only a small mention of guns as a concern in the last paragraph.
Not to take away from 45superman his due recognition, he pinned this letter which I found to be very well written. I only added the last paragraph to it. It is posted for others to use here on my Blog and on 45superman's Blog.
Monday, January 5, 2009
Rules of Engagement
Rules of Engagement
Been a lot of finger pointing, name-calling, foot stomping, temper tantrums, and blame with in the pro Gun community. This is leading the anti gunners into laughing fits, because it has divided us even further then we ever were. One side says we should use legal means to fight for our rights, the other side say they have had enough banding words and the time is now to act.
Well in a sense both are right and both are wrong. A point I would like to make here is that we have no clear cut rules for engagement that must be defined as to when, where, and how we will react. This is all being left up to our own interpretation as to how many violations we will endure and how we will handle it. Hell we cannot even agree on just what our rights are. Nor how we will defend them.
If we were smart we would be putting together a modern version of the Continental Congress on line and debating with the intent to put together a single document that the vast majority would agree with and support come hell or high water and this would be our guide as to the actions we would take.
A good start would be to create a board for the soul purpose of this debate. The boards will not be for discussing which weapon is best or what type of ammo should be used or anything like that. It would amount to a meeting of minds in forming a modern Continental congress. The Mod’s of the board must keep everything on topic, votes must be taken and all members should cast their vote.
At the least we should have 10 million members who are voicing their opinions. But we may have to settle for a few hundred. This should not be an argument and in fighting board and all opinions are as valid as any others. With a vote we can narrow down the rules.But all in all this meeting will have no ass unless the people are will to except and defend what is voted on by the majority.
Do we have any takers on this task?
opaww
Been a lot of finger pointing, name-calling, foot stomping, temper tantrums, and blame with in the pro Gun community. This is leading the anti gunners into laughing fits, because it has divided us even further then we ever were. One side says we should use legal means to fight for our rights, the other side say they have had enough banding words and the time is now to act.
Well in a sense both are right and both are wrong. A point I would like to make here is that we have no clear cut rules for engagement that must be defined as to when, where, and how we will react. This is all being left up to our own interpretation as to how many violations we will endure and how we will handle it. Hell we cannot even agree on just what our rights are. Nor how we will defend them.
If we were smart we would be putting together a modern version of the Continental Congress on line and debating with the intent to put together a single document that the vast majority would agree with and support come hell or high water and this would be our guide as to the actions we would take.
A good start would be to create a board for the soul purpose of this debate. The boards will not be for discussing which weapon is best or what type of ammo should be used or anything like that. It would amount to a meeting of minds in forming a modern Continental congress. The Mod’s of the board must keep everything on topic, votes must be taken and all members should cast their vote.
At the least we should have 10 million members who are voicing their opinions. But we may have to settle for a few hundred. This should not be an argument and in fighting board and all opinions are as valid as any others. With a vote we can narrow down the rules.But all in all this meeting will have no ass unless the people are will to except and defend what is voted on by the majority.
Do we have any takers on this task?
opaww
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)