Sunday, June 12, 2011

As a citizen of America just what do I expect from our government?

Federal government: To insure that reasonable treaties of commerce between friendly nations are running smoothly. To see to it that America has reasonable security, but not at the expense of the freedoms and rights of the citizens. To adhere to the laws of the Constitution as was written in the beginning. To keep government small and functional under the Constitution. To insure that the people are not burdened with excessive taxes and control spending of moneys that belongs to the people and not the government. To insure that laws apply equally among all Americans.

State government: To insure that the state and its people are secure of aggression from enemies foreign and domestic. To hold the federal government liable for violations of Constitutional law. To insure that free and unmolested commerce between citizens go smoothly. To fight for lower taxes of the peoples and goods. To maintain a very conservative spending of the Citizens tax dollars on necessary infrastructure. To insure that all peoples follow the Republic and not some half assed social-ist/communist dictatorship. To insure the right to work of all citizens. To remove excessive, unjust, and unconstitutional laws.

Local Government: To hold the state government accountable for violations of Constitutional law. To insure the citizens have a right to free commerce and trade. To insure that local needs are met. To keep law enforcement up to date on education, training, equipment, and pay. To provide for the general education of the children. To uphold the security of the peoples in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure.

Law Enforcement: To uphold, protect, and defend, the Constitution first and foremost. To hold that all peoples are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. To be the friend of the public and not a supporter of a police state. To insure that the laws are fair among all the citizens. To insure some security from crime for the peoples, (the peoples must take responsibility for their own protection). To insure that the people have equal access to the means for self-preservation of property, self and family.

The citizen: To keep your fucking nose out of my business unless I am breaking the law. Hold all of the above’s feet to the fire. (Accountability of the government)

opaww

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Project Gunwalker and giving credit where credit is due.

It has been quite a while sense I posted in my Blog so I thought I would post something.

Many of the Lamestream media for the last 3 months have avoided the story of Project Gunwalker. Of the one who have said something about it, they have put their usual Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell anti-gun spin, and yes even Fox News has avoided this issue like the plague.

I believe in giving credit where credit is due and it is due with interest to Mike Vanderboegh and David Codrea, the real question is, will they get the proper recognition for their efforts? I really don’t think so because the Lamestream medias regard them as low life bloggers and not true Authorized Urnalists. If it was not for these two, other bloggers, and the hand full of ATF agents who saw the wrong the ATF was engaged in, the world would just be going about their lazy busyness of complacency.

The Lamestream media such as communist news network (CNN), MSNBC, ABC and many news rags like the New York slimes, would be telling you that you can only believe that the ATF is doing a great job of stifling the rights of free Americans, and that they need more money and manpower to further their Gestapo tactics against Law Abiding citizens. Of course this is all under the control of the Department of InJustice, which is controlled by Homeland Insecurity, who is under the thumb of osamaobama and his group of elite tyrants in government.

For years I have avoided many of these Lamestream medias due to their socialist leaning beliefs, and this included CBS. Sense CBS was willing to take on the issues of Project Gunwalker to the airwaves and I personally believe at great risk. They have moved up a few notches in my book of responsible news medias. Sheryl Attkisson not only did a great job of investigating, and reporting this scandal but she is dam nice to look at too. Though it took quite a while for CBS to get on this bandwagon, they did come through.

Other noted Bloggers such as David Workman and Kurk Hofmann, along with others that I just can not remember have aided in this story by helping to keep the ball rolling with their own columns in the Examiner. Many thanks to all who helped spread the word and to the ATF agents who risked everything to shed light on something I believe got out of hand in the upper ranks of oppressive task masters in government. Yes there are some good ATF agents with hart and soul to do the right thing, and many are not the enemy of the pro-gunners but only wish to keep the bad guys from reeking havoc on the innocent in society.

opaww

Thursday, May 13, 2010

No fly/No buy

It is real easy to yell rights violation when it is your rights being violated. But if it is someone that we don’t know then most people tend to be mum on voicing decent against any violation of rights. Just take a for instance the Time Square dumb ass I mean Bomber, Many are saying that we should forgo his rights to anything because he is a terrorist, others are harping on a no buy for people on the no fly list.

Some are trading some freedom for a little bit of self-perceived protection just to ease their minds. In the case of the Time Square bomber, he was not on the no fly list so he could fly; buy guns and ammo, along with other things. So just what good does taking rights away have to do with this guy. Nothing because he was legally entitled to all freedoms and rights that we all have.

Now that POS bloomberg wants to make anyone on the no fly list a criminal with out due process of law. Just so he can deny Second Amendment rights to another group of American citizens without just cause. Many on the no fly list are common names that match a lot of people. So by denying rights to anyone on that list it will deny innocent people their rights because they have the same name as someone who is a person of interests.

If you are a hard-core terrorist hoping for your 72 virgins, and you are not part of the no fly list then I guess you can get anything you want. This will make no deference to the outcome of your attempt to visit Allah in person. Unless bloomberg and his other sheep are proposing we should racial profile people to insure they are on the no fly/no buy list. That may have had some effect on the bomber if he was on the list to start with and it was a no fly/no buy list. Though he still could buy propane, gasoline, fertilizer, and other components for bomb making. He just would not of been able to buy a gun, which he did not use.

The soul purpose of the no fly/no buy list is to deny law abiding Citizens their rights to buy, own, and use firearms, nothing more. If you speak out against one or more of osamaobamas policies or maybe tend a Tea Party rally then by Homoland Insecurity you are a person of interest and can be placed on the no fly list. When you actually did nothing to even closely relate to the need for your name to be added to the list.

This list is so secret that even a judge has no authority to call forth the list to see who is on it, nor do they have to prove justification for putting your name on the list. If you file a suite all that Homoland Insecurity has to do is tell the judge that they have reasonable cause for your name to be on the list, without providing anything to the courts.

This list is a grave injustice to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, but the reason they get away with it is because the people will not stand up against it. A lot of sheep are saying well it is for the greater good, so we just have to put up with it, which is until they want to fly some place and find their names are on the list. Then we also have names that should be on the list are not like the known terrorist friend of osamaobama “ayers”. This POS can still fly anywhere he wants to and yet he is a known terrorist.

People need to get a set of balls and start flooding the legislature and white house with their disapproval of this injustice of American rights before it really is to late to do anything about it. If we allow any rights violations by this government then they will not stop and shall end up violating all rights of everyone who is not an elite.

The clock is ticking away and with every passing minute we see more violations of American rights. Soon it will be to late to stop the blood bath that is coming. The time to act is now not tomorrow. Pass this on to everyone you know and have them start writing those that believe they are our taskmasters. Make a stand for what is right and not for the elite slave owners (the government) in America.

opaww

Monday, May 10, 2010

What part of illegal do you not understand?

It is not illegal immigrant, but rather illegal alien. One does not immigrate illegally, this implies the lack of legal procedure, and/or respect for a countries laws. If one is immigrating then it implies going through the proper channels and laws to achieve the desired results.

If you are here in this country illegally then you are a lawbreaker and should be thrown in jail to serve time then deported. If you come here through legal channels and try to be legal then good, and I say more power to you.

The only way to stem the illegal tide of aliens is for them to get a backbone and arm themselves to take back their country. Once they remove the corruption then they can start to look for industry to help the unemployment. Instead of relying on handouts from other countries that go into the pockets of the elite, then they can start to use that money to rebuild their own country and make it something.

Just as with many countries though mexico is lazy and does not want to risk their own lives to secure freedom and safety. They would rather sponge off other countries and let someone else do the dirty work for them. If the American military formed up and rolled across the boarder to clean out the bad guys in mexico they would all cheer until it was done then they would demand us out of the country.

None of the illegal aliens would lift a finger to help secure their country, why should they? Sense they get free handouts here and don’t have to do anything but vote for the social-ists who will give them more.

opaww

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Do you Really support the Second Amendment Part 2

Rifled barrels = Actually dates as far back at the 15th century but was not really produced until the 18th century. Due to the complexities of producing the rifling. During the revolutionary war for independence we saw the first real use of rifled barrels in muskets. Where marksman (snipers) was given rifled barreled muskets to use against the enemy.

Flintlock = dates some place around 1635 where the need for faster and reliable firing of weapons had a need.

Percussion cap = 1842 where again the need for faster and more reliable firing of small arms was needed.

Metallic case cartridges = was introduced around 1845

Revolvers = has a related history dating as far back as 1597 with the revolving arquebus produced by Hans Stopler, but the real leader in advanced forearms design was Samuel Colt with his 1836 patented designed revolver which enjoyed a lot of new innovations over the years sense.

Lever action rifles = actually dates back to around 1848 but saw no real popularity until right around 1860

Semi automatic weapons = can be dated back to 1885 with Ferdinand Ritter von Mannlicher’s Model 85 semi automatic rifle which spurned other designs and innovations in shot guns, rifles, and handguns.

Full automatic weapons = Actually are dated back to 1862 and are directly related to the Gatling gun.

SURPRISE full Automatic weapons were never against the law for individual citizens to buy, own, and use and still are not against the law. Though in 1934 congress passed the National Firearms Act, effectively placing a tax on manufacturing and transfer of certain firearms and full auto weapons fell under this bogus attempt at restricting personal ownership.

Just what is this about you might be saying? Well it has to do with a train of belief in many circles where some people believe that our founders had no insight into the advancements of modern weapons. You see they were smart men, some were very educated, and most had the foresight to know that weapons would advance in function, design, and lethality.

At no time in our history until the 1934 was there any restrictions place on buying selling, owning, and/or using any small arms by the citizens of this country. I had a copy of and link to the actual minutes of the meeting in congress back in 1932 where they were trying to figure out how to ban ownership, and use of private owned weapons. The Unites States Attorney General then shot down ever conceived scam to ban guns for civilian ownership based on Constitutional grounds except the taxing of them under the interstate commerce clause. Which is technically not a ban but it gave the BATF the authority to deny you the tax stamp on certain weapons they felt one should not own.

Even at that meeting of congress in 1932 one of the reasons for the ban on private gun ownership was racist in nature, where one congressman stated and it is on record, that the worst thing we can do is to let a black man (ni_ _ _r) have a pistol and a bottle of whisky on a train.

Up until the usurping of the governments power over constitutional gun rights in 1934 one could order a full automatic Thompson sub-machine gun or even a BAR right from the Sears and Roebuck catalog and it would be mailed right to you. Many general stores had them on the shelf.

Most of the fears of gun ownership stem from the government fearful of the populist. They use any and all excuses to take from you a GOD given right, backed by our Bill of Rights. Hollywood is no friend to the Bill of Rights unless some restriction is directly placed on them but for the common citizen they support any attempt to deny you of something that was given by a higher authority then them, the government or mankind.

A lot of what we have today and basically sense the early 1900’s is a lack of belief in a GOD who granted us these rights. Where man is steadily renouncing even the thought of a higher being, who is more important and powerful then man himself, we are running into the train of thought that our Second Amendment rights was not granted by such a being but rather by the all powerful government and they can choose to take that right any time they want.

opaww

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Do you really support the Second Amendment?

When anyone says will I support the Second Amendment but…they are really saying that they do not in fact support the Second Amendment because the Second Amendment is unconditional not like the other rights.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Here we have Amendment I, show me where it says that no one can restrict any of these rights? It plainly says “Congress shall not”, putting a restriction on a given federal government body “the Congress”. No restrictions on the state at all so we had to have a 14th Amendment to stop states from enacting laws denying the rights as recognized by our First Amendment.

Contrary to popular opinion the right to yell fire in a crowded theater is not a federal law, restriction nor even a mandate. But comes from state laws not actually restricting the actual speech but rather placing consequences for the words you utter that may cause harm to body or reputation (slander) of persons. Even here we must still use due process of law before we can find someone guilty of an offence of free speech, or any of the listed rights in the First Amendment.


AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The Second Amendment has no restrictions place on it, as does the First Amendment. It clearly states, “Shall not be infringed”, this alone is the most powerful statement in the whole of the Second Amendment. It does not say shall not be infringed “except”, it does not say shall not be infringed by Congress, nor just the brady bunch. It says “shall not be infringed” clearly restricting any infringement by anyone, except through due process of law.

The Second Amendment needs no protection of the 14th Amendment because it is automatically incorporated to any and all governing bodies. The Bill of Rights was created to restrict government from violating the listed rights and this included all forms of government in the USA unless specified other wise as is in the First Amendment.

Due process of law was always held to mean until sentence was served in full then all rights were restored fully. In the middle of the 20th century we seen the advent of new meanings calling some violations of law to be felony’s and the restrictions of life time punishment for the felony’s to continue well after the time was served.

Today we see some rights restored by the courts except the Second Amendment. Very few have ever had their Second Amendment rights restored even after a court ruled in their favor. The BATFU still holds the right to deny you the Second Amendment rights regardless if a court rules to give it back to you.

It was never once a felon always a felon, until the middle of the 20th century and the need of socialists to control the people of this country and for them to decide what rights you should have. Then we saw the corruption of the meaning and miss-interpretation of the wording of the rights so they could get people to believe it was all wrong for 200 years.

Then we saw the adding of some laws as felons this continued until today where almost everything is a felony, or can be made into a felony for convenience. The rights everyone had is slowly being eroded to a point where most people just shrug their shoulders and say it does not effect me or there is nothing I can do about it. Removing a right is simple today sense most people will not band together and stop it.

If you say, “I support the Second Amendment except,” you are leading more credence to the division of our power to stop further restrictions on rights. Once rights are gone it takes spilling of blood and/or dam near a miracle to get them back.

opaww

Monday, August 31, 2009

Is it possible?

Some tend to think nothing is wrong with our country and everything is hunky dory. Others might argue that many things are wrong with America and we are being flushed down the toilet. Depending on how one looks at everything will dictate how one believes. If you’re a left leaning socialist democrat then everything is great. If you’re a right leaning conservative then we are in the end times with hell in America.

Not to rain on any-ones parade but America is in a sinkhole and the only way to get us out is nothing short of a revolt against the tyrants that have, and are putting us there.

Capitalism
The people, who complain that capitalism is wrong and criminal, are a can short of a full six-pack. Capitalism has made this country great, raising above all the rest of the world. A person, who argues against Capitalism, is for the most part lazy asses who want what everyone has without working for it.

The use of such words like racist, hate mongering, slavery, ect. play a part in scaring people into following the beliefs of the lazy in trashing our Capitalist based country. They are afraid to be tagged as anything but a sheep. I got news for the lazy, and that is Capitalism did not create slavery, man did.

If Capitalism is so wrong then why is it that the rest of the world wants our money? If we eliminate Capitalism then the rest of the world will starve, sense we Americans are the soul supporters of many lazy countries.

Gun Control
Well one can see that the world peace has not materialized yet even though much of the world does not allow its slaves to own firearms. With the ever pressing need for some in America to have everyone become a victim of violence by the government, we can see the need to remain armed and vigilant at all times.

If this socialist administration has it’s way we Americans will become the world slaves, where by we work to support the nasty habits of foreign countries, which we basically do now anyway. Being citizens armed and vigilant is the last bearer against total slavery of the masses.

Some where around 125,000,000 to 150,000,000 people in the 20th century alone have been killed in countries that would not allow it’s citizens to be armed for defense. Some very nasty tyrants have raised their ugly heads in many of them same countries.

Education
Some place with in the 20th century we lost the American education of our children, replacing it with diversity, non-secular, humanistic, victimization teachings of our very future.

We no longer produce Americans, who are educated in the fine art of being American, and proud, but rather we have become pussyafied men who are more women then women are. Women have become the dominant alpha males in our society, extolling the virtues of castrating the once male figures. This has been taught with in our schools for many long years.

Some of it creeping in the teachings here and there, very slowly so as to not raise red flags to alarm the people. I just read yesterday where a young girl who was a member of her High School ROTC class, got suspended from school for 6 days in Florida for chastising a student wiring a Burka, and refusing to stand and salute the American flag and refusing to say the pledge of allegiance. Why? Because she had hurt the feelys of someone else who does not support America but is here leaching off our fruits of labor.

Freedom of Speech
Well it seems that soon we can kiss this one good by; sense the fairness doctrine will put undue requirements on rightwing speech. Requiring an apposing view to be published, or broadcast, where it may be none approved speech by the current administration. Not to mention that many would be protectors of rights out there, want to shut down any thing that speaks against the socialist doctrines of this current cesspool of our government.

The left leaning socialist has enough hate mongers of the American way of life that they do not need to force the right wing into allowing an apposing view on their broadcasts. This fairness doctrine does not support the same requirements for the socialist talk shows nor printed views. So it is not really a fairness doctrine but rather a suppression of right wing free speech.

Supporting the fairness doctrine is none other then the Authorized journalists from cnn, abc, cbs, and nbc. Sense it will give then authority over any news that they wish to drown us out of.

Freedom of religion
Don’t bet on it, you will loose your hard earned money. Oops sorry the government is taking that anyway, but you will have IOU’s in its place. As was posted on the forum the other day we see where a religious hating judge has ordered a 10 year old girl to attend public school because she defends her beliefs to vigorously. In other words you can go to church but keep your mouth shout about your beliefs unless it is wicca, witchcraft, muslim, or Kwanzaa, then you can say all you want.

Don’t even think about displaying your beliefs in a given religion if it has to do with Christianity, or Judaism in school, they have and will make you stop and/or suspend you for it. Do not attack other religions of the world because you will be hung out to dry by the very self same people who some times sit next to you in your church.

Some professed Christian religions embrace acceptance of occults and non-secular beliefs with in their very buildings they are suppose to be worshiping Christ in. Some even have stopped the reference to Christ, so as to not offend others of diversity.

We even see an acceptance of sin within these self same churches; because it would be hate mongering to not allow a fag, child molester to not be a priest, preacher, or deacon. When it is clear that “GOD” (was I just political incorrect), (let me fix the politically incorrect and make it DOG so as to not offend) that homosexuality was a sin of one of the worst kinds.

Corrupt government
This is hard sense all corruption is in the eyes of the beholder, however we see this administration sh*t deep in forced change toward socialism. This is a corruption of the worst kind sense we Americans are not a socialist state.

We might ask ourselves how they can achieve this belief in socialism. The only way is through force, and threats. If you choose to speak out against a political meeting of this administration, then you are a racist, terrorist, right wing Christian, their words not mine.

Now comes the part everyone does not want to see. The forced part, where we will not have any choices left to us. In order for this administration to gain absolute power they must fill every hole in government with likeminded ass wipes, (Have we seen this yet?).

Then they must amass a force, which will enforce the will of the government on the citizens, (private Army anyone).

Lets not forget the corruption of the meanings of the Constitution and Bill of Rights to convince everyone that they and our founders were wrong, (living documents).

Create panic to use the executive power to suspend what rights they can, (maybe a flu like fear).

Make everything against the authority of the government, by make everyone not to your liking a potential terrorist, (Homoland Insecurity).

Restrict Americans in their travels and just what they can buy, (No fly, No buy list).

Gain control of our money and banks, (maybe pass a law giving full access of your bank accounts to the government, (Government run health care H.R. 3200)).

Though there are a few more steps in the process, the last is proclaim yourself as supreme leader of America and suspend all elections under what ever excuses you can find. (This has not happened yet but stand by).

opaww

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Records being kept

GUNnympho said, “Dude... I could go to the local sheriffs dept and they could easily tell me how many guns i have registered in my name. Sure the depth of class three firearms and silencers is more in depth.... but the papers filled out at the dealer don’t just sit in a filling cabinet.” http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f12/purchasing-my-first-firearm-15591/index2.html

This got me to thinking about something I read about just within the last few months, where a collage student was assigned to write and give a lecture about something that was a high profile issue in America now. So he picked the subject in support of guns on campus.

When giving his lecture he made no statement that could be construed as a threat, but his teacher reported him to school security and they whisked him into their office and grilled him like a common criminal. They also produced a list of guns he owned and demanded he tell them where they were, how they were stored, and other things about them that they had no need to know.

Now one might think well nothing here to be concerned about. But one should look at the fact that a collage campus security had a list of all the guns that he owned. Where did they get the list? From what I remember there was not enough time for them to go to each gun dealer and inquire about the purchased weapons by this person not to mention that school security is rent-a-cop with no authority to canvas any gun shop records.

A few years after the passing of the brady bill requiring a federal background check. I believe it was found that the governor of New Jersey was acquiring all weapons purchases information from the Background checks to keep and compile a national database with. I seem to remember some law suite I think by the NRA to put a stop to it and have the records destroyed. The case was won and this perpetrator of citizen disarmament was ordered to destroy the records and stop any further compiling of said lists.

Whether he complied or not I cannot say nor can I prove, but I tend to believe he did not. Here in Hardin county Kentucky the Sheriff was caught making his own files of people who applied for a CCWP, which is against state law. Legal action was brought against him; to stop and destroy all compiled records. Supposedly he complied but it is in question now sense my son applied and the Sheriff took 2 photos of him for the CCWP it is believed he is still compiling and keeping records of his own. A new legal action is about to be brought against him but he probably will blow this off as well. (Note) Only one photo is required for a CCWP here in Kentucky and sense the Sheriff was caught making the second photo for his record it is believed he is at it again.

I believe that some form of compiled records of what guns, who purchased them is being kept some place, possible on a local level or possible both federal and local. Can I prove it NO, but from these listed cases and some other things I have read about it leads me to believe it is possible.

opaww

Friday, July 10, 2009

Amices brief from 34 states Attorney Generals

As of right now there are 34 signatures on the Amices brief from 34 states Attorney Generals supporting the incorporation of the 14th amendment into the 2nd Amendment. One might think this is a good thing sense if the Supreme Court rules in favor of incorporation it will make each state the same. But really think about it, like an anti-gunner and see if it sounds so great.

With an incorporation of the 14th Amendment into the 2nd Amendment you now have all states that must abide by federal law and if the anti-gunners can get federal law passed restricting some form of gun control then each state will have to comply. Where if it is not incorporated then a state can tell the federal government to shove it.

Also consider this, that the Attorney General of commiefornia Jerry Brown has signed this brief in support of incorporation. Do not be so fast to say that Jerry Brown is a pro-gunner sense he has control of what is a legal firearm in commiefornia. The list of banned guns in commiefornia is longer then my arm, as the saying goes. So if an anti-gunner like Jerry Brown is supporting the incorporation then something must be wrong. Let us also consider that the brady bunch also wants this ruling of incorporation.

Let us not forget that the Scotus ruling in the case of Heller vs. D.C. was not the win that was spewed forth by some semi-pro-gun groups. It left the door open for reasonable restrictions with out actually defining these restrictions and anyone can say a total ban of everything but a S&W .22lr. Pistol is reasonable. Licensing of gun owners and each weapon can be considered reasonable in many eyes of socialism. This will depend on how the rulers in our governments see it; little input from the actual public will be almost nil.

With the miss guided Scotus ruling already in place, this ruling may just be the thing the anti-American/anti-gunners are waiting for. Largely because of the left undone and said of the Scotus ruling in Heller vs. D.C. With the 2nd Amendment stating, “Shall not infringe” and this meaning is quite clear to even a moron, we still have infringement being forced on us all the time under the guise of reasonable restrictions, and for public safety.

I see no place in the 2nd Amendment the authority to restrict this right in any way, shape, or form by any governing body whether it be local, county, state, or federal. I see no authority to allow reasonable restrictions for any cause at all. The issue of public safety is largely used as a form of authority to restrict a right that is absolute, when public safety has nothing to do with it. Weapons account for far less deaths and injuries then does Automobiles and yet automobiles are not protected by the Constitution. Also they are not under the over zealous attacks by the socialists in America.

Doctors have nearly a 12 to 1 ratio of accidental deaths compared to accidental gun deaths every year. But we don’t see the socialists screaming about banning Doctors. Auto’s have a ratio of 2 to 1 but we don’t see the over zealous cry by the socialists for their outright ban. If the socialists can affect a total ban on private weapons then I believe that all forms of private transportation will become their next target.

opaww

Monday, July 6, 2009

False arrest

While reading, and thinking about what may or may not happen with our government regarding the outlook of it turning socialist and un-American I came away with another impression. This being just as dangerous to the American people as anything else.

False arrest under the pretence of falsified information, say you are an outspoken appoint of osamaobama and his ill begotten socialists in our government (I don’t know anyone who would do this though) and they want to put a muzzle on you. All that is required is for someone to say you need to be shut up. The feds take the ball from there and with the aid of the socialist supporting news media you will be found to be anything from a child molester to an out right white supremacy and maybe everything else in between.

Never having done anything more then voice your opinion and beliefs. If you are not shot and killing in the raid to quite you, you will be jailed without bond possibly and this amounts to guilty until proven innocent. Most of us little people have not the money to hire a high priced lawyer let alone even a lawyer of any type to defend us. In essence we will go to jail regardless, effectively muzzling any opposition speech.

The ability to get a fair trial will be null sense the socialist news media has all but proven your guilt to the world and most people will believe them without a second thought. Along with the very liberal socialist judges in place already I just don’t feel comfortable with getting set free.

This being a very real threat to freedom loving Americans we now can invision a use for the 200+ concentration camps (that we don’t have in America). Like many dictators of the past and present many people who are considered opposition just simply disappear never to heard from again. This socialist dictator in office will be no deferent, it just may take him a second term in office before he gets real pissy toward our rights to free speech.

Though some may view this as tin hat stuff or just won’t happen, it has a surreal feel to it and should not be taken lightly. Most times we ourselves will simply see it happening right in front of our noses. We have become complacent in listening to the news media and saying to ourselves that they must of done something wrong, why else would they have 50 armed men in full tactical gear to arrest this one person and 5 black helicopters flying over head?

This makes me look back to such incidents as Waco, Ruby Ridge and wander. Not wanting to be a conspiracy theorist with regard to these two situations, but if memory serves me right the news media had already sliced and diced them to the public before the shooting started.

With every arrest of any suspected criminal we have the news media perching on the bandwagon about the virtues and need for his arrest. As I see and listen to them flap their mouths off of just how bad this guy is the last thing we hear from them is a sarcastic remark about them possibly being innocent until a court says deferent.
So why even extol the virtues of this persons arrest if you do not know his guilt nor can absolutely prove his involvement in the act you say he is? I would have to say that it boils down to a socialist view by the news media, which is to lend credence to their want for power over the tiny American slaves.

opaww

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Senate Bill Would Fine People More Than $1,000 for Refusing Health Care Coverage

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/02/senate-democrats-trim-cost-health-care/

The most resent release of the socialist health care by our government call for mandatory participation or be subject to a $1000 fine each year you don’t have the socialist health care. This bill may just pass sense we have a vast majority of socialists in congress.

Friday, June 26, 2009

Socialist health care, 3 (The attack of the truffles)

I believe his royal highness osamaobama would be more then pissed if he red this along with his but buddies in congress but sense they don’t read low life resistances I can say osamaobama go fuck your self.

With the advent of socialist health care in America the need for malpractice suits will go away. Under the guise of lessening the cost of the over all health care and sense you don’t pay for what you get there will be no need for the doctors and hospitals to be insured against bad medical practices.

The need for trained medical staff will actually go up because many doctors will just simply quite medicine. We will see many new doctors whose diplomas come right out of a cracker jacks box. With a the manual “how to be a doctor for dummies”, and you will sit on one of their tables where this doctor with a bag of plumbing tools instead of medical equipment will tend to you.

The socialist doctors will have pliers to remove a hangnail with, but don’t worry you don’t have to pay for it. They may use something like a hack saw to perform an operation where they need to cut you open, but don’t worry you don’t got to pay for it. Its free health care. Of course if your constipated the doctor has a plumbers snake to clear you out with at no charge to you.

All these fine tool that an aspiring doctor would ever want comes to them free along with their course “how to be a doctor for dummies” and a beautiful diploma that they can hang on their wall. All this for the price of socialism, but wait as an added bonus they will throw in a sub course of “how to be a dentists for dummies”.

Modeling our socialist health care after many other nations in the world we may just see something like mandatory Ti Chi being conducted in our neighborhoods each and every morning before you are off to the rice patties for your daily work. But don’t fret any, it is all a part of your free socialist health care that commissar osamaobama, and his cronies in Washington decided you needed.

It is possible that one may also see a daily reporting of just what you ate yesterday and how much exercise you got via the internet. You just might be required to submit this report each and every day so a doctor and/or hospital can see if you are keeping up with your orders for a life style they have choose for you.

Sense we will be a socialism and not the republic we were born of, there will be no need for religion anymore. Communism does not really have religions and the socialist health care is health care for the body, mind and spirit. I guess the reason we have legalized abortion is so the socialists could legally abort this republic and get away with it. But don’t worry its free with your forced socialist health care.

It is very possible that confessionals will be installed in each and every clinic and each hospital, so that you can confess before seeing the doctor. (Forgive me doctor for I have sinned, I ate an extra chocolate bar yesterday, and two truffles the day before.) My child you need to say two fuck Mary’s and run an extra half-mile, you are absolved of your sins go back to the rice patties.

opaww

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Socialist health care, the sequel

Something I left out in Socialist health care, “the movie”, is how the socialists in our country will get the vast majority of Americans to except this reason for supporting legalized abortion (socialist health care). That being the ministry of propaganda, in order to get the sheep in America to believing this is what America wants and needs.

Yes we do have a propaganda ministry, you may not recognize it as it is but should understand when it is explained to you.

Part of our propaganda ministry is the news media and probably the biggest part of it. Such news media as CNN (communist news network), NBC (national broadcast communists), CBS (communist broadcast service), and ABC (American broadcast communists), all have decided that anything they report is what Americans should believe and want without question by us surf’s. Not to mention their desire and attempts to close down free speech and free press or at least have free press ruled as exclusively theirs. Virtually stopping all other possible news surceases like Blogs, web sites, and basement printing presses. Anything to stop the free flow of thought, ideas, and speech other then what is approved by the government and/or authorized news medias.

Yes Margo the selfish authorized news media and authorized journalists have tried and still try to shut down these other surceases of news and proclaimed their self’s the only authorized and real news in America. Another attempt to shut the peoples up is what is called the fairness doctrine, or the fairness in media doctrine whichever title they want to stick to it. It alone will stifle free speech along with free thought, unless it is pre-approved by our glorious leaders.

Using such socialist ideas as making speech against something our government, politicians, and/or media and their ideologies as hate speech and thus illegal is just another way to say shut the fuck up and believe as we tell you to believe. The government is behind and supportive of this arm of the propaganda ministry, they have the most to gain and the most to loose, namely power, control, and money.

For way to long has our government and news media believed that they were all powerful, and having the rights above us slaves in America. Sighting some obscure passage that may of come right out of Linen’s own written works, or possible Mao Tsa Tong’s books, possibly from Hitler himself, as Constitutional proof of their royalist and right to dictate to free Americans.

Yes this does have to do with socialist health care because if no one can present an apposing side that is not pre-approved by our government then the government has managed its goal of keeping us in the dark. Therefore we Americans will just go about our daily government proscribed lives.

When the governing body in the U.S. invokes Lincoln it simply means get back to work and pay your dues. Most of the political leaches in our government that invoke Lincoln are democrats, and just why would a democrat invoke Lincoln when he was a republican.

Not to rain on the socialist’s parade but socialist health care is a European socialist concept and not American. We can even see just by the fact that this will be forced on us that its roots are deeply embedded in socialism.

One part of the socialist health care is the evaluation of the mental condition of said people everywhere. Any and all differing life styles, belief’s, and thought can and will be used as a deviate form of mental health problem. Which will make a qualifier for possessing, owning and buying weapons illegal. It is very likely that the mental health issue is a part of the whole package of socialist health care the government will require you to have.

If one thinks or acts outside the prescribed norm in the socialist medical community then you have a mental problem. This is just another way of control the government will lay on your sorry ass, and the propaganda ministry will use it to take more rights away from the peoples that they don’t want you to have.

If one were to look at the socialist health care in many countries you would see monstrosities that we Americans would normally never put up with. Such as Russia (former Soviet Union) where their health care was free but an assembly line like in a car manufacturing plant.

Patents needing cataract surgery were laid on a table side by side and a doctor set at the head. The patent and bed would roll to his position and he would do his little part in the surgery then the patent would roll to the next doctor where he would do his little part, and so on and so on until you were through the line then you were helped out of bed and told to return to work.

Well I am not a car to be worked on like a brainless manufacturing assembly line; so Russian type of socialist health care can go fuck its self. Then we have Indian socialist health care.

In India if a woman needed an abortion that is oft times put in a bed where a doctor would come to her and do the procedure right there without and anesthetic at all, no operating room, and no privacy. It is widely reported to be very painful and little or no attention was given her until she either bled to death or the medical staff told her it was time to go and she would be released.

Most socialist health care systems in the world is way over crowded to a point where no one really gets the personal attention like they do in our health care system right now. What our commerads in office want you to believe that this socialist health care is utopia and everyone will be a walking prime example of super human Americans, whom bows down to the enlightened that has led us into being subjects to Europe.

Just take a tour of the socialist health care facilities of the world and see what is in store for you if America goes the way of forced health care. Of course we won’t be operating on you in a mud hut like in some parts of Africa. After all we are civilized and modern, but then again we will be giving more money to other countries in order for them to be just like us, so there will be less for our needs. However we should have enough money to at the very least plant grass in the hut you will get your health care in.

When you come out of the socialist health care from the new assembly line operations you will have the option of having a GM, Chrysler, or Ford emblem tacked to your forehead at no charge to you.

opaww

Monday, June 22, 2009

Socialist health care, "The Movie"

Just in the last 2 weeks we have heard and read a lot about the reforms the government wants to impose on us in health care. Some may think it good and some may thing it bad, but any forced compliance of the people to ad-hear to any new law regarding health care is nothing short of socialism.

This countries was not founded as a socialism, nor are we a socialism, and any attempt to pervert it to socialism is paramount to a declaration of war against the freedoms that we Americans have enjoyed sense our founding. Do not blame the American people who make a stand against forced socialism. It is our right to say fuck off you communist prick.

The government wants to force health care upon every citizen in America so they can fall in line with the socialist governments of the world. Some of the things they want to force on us are, a health plan that you cannot opt out of but must have regardless of ability or want to pay.

National data based health information of each and every person in the country, now just why do they need to do this? A doctor in New York has no need or business being able to access my health records. The government has no business knowing anything about my health needs.

Forced health maintance, where by a doctor and/or hospital can and will demand you live with in an approved life style. You will only be able to eat what they tell you, drink what they want you to drink, have sex when, where, and with whom they say, own what they feel you should own. Anything not approved by the government, doctor, and/or hospital will be deemed illegal and you may be arrested and imprisoned possibly without a trial.

Once a year or possible twice a year you will be required to report to the nearest hospital or assigned medical facility where you will under go a physical exam regardless if you want it or not. If they feel you need shots you will get them regardless if you really need it. This will include experimental drugs that may or may not be healthy for you. If you removed a splinter that was superficial in nature and they find out that you did, you could be arrested and grilled as to why you did it instead of going to the hospital and having a dick head there remove it.

To offer a health care plan where Americans can look at and decide if it is right for them is OK but to force any type of health care on a citizen should be met with force amounting to rebellion.

Let us not forget another important issue regarding forced health care, and that is who and how is this going to be paid for? As of the release of the congressional health care plan they had no idea how to pay for it, none what so ever. Suggestions that are being batted around right now are increasing taxes on everyone and everything. Some dub this as a sin tax because in their warped opinions you don’t need to eat tweekies.

There are deferent taxes they are hoping to institute in order to pay for this all. One being a tax on goods (sin tax) like fast food, cakes, candy, sodas, coffee, tobacco, booze, meat, and just about anything they consider bad for you. Of course the Doctors will deem these things bad and therefore illegal so you won’t be able to buy them anyway.

The other tax they are looking at is income tax, every two-bit politician says no new taxes but they never say that they will not raise the taxes you already pay. This along with the sin tax will probably be how the government tries to pay for it and I say tries. This will end like all other programs where they tax the shit out of Americans to pay for it. It will end up in the coffers of the government and in the pockets of the leaches. The real object here is to force Americans into being one of the highest tax paying countries in the world in order to pay for the worlds problems.

No nation with socialized health care has lower taxes unless they are third world countries where we already subsidize their costs through the world thieves (the U.N.). Another way they are thinking of for paying for this monstrosity is through the employer where every business must pay all the medical insurance and costs associated with health care, regardless if your employed with them or not. Now if I had a business and I was told I had to pay for others health care outside my employees I would just close down and lay everyone off and they could just collect unemployment and get some form of welfare medical.

Not one thought of cutting existing useless government programs was ever though of when the half wits in congress decided to put together this abortion of American freedoms. I still wander of we Americans are paying 50 million dollars a year to support inner-city youth midnight basketball programs. Well if we are then it needs to stop and that money put toward health care. Maybe we could stop paying the 50 million dollar give away the government gives each and every new congressman when they first enter office, supposedly for their state but many seem to all of a sudden started a family business of a consultant firm or some such leaching criminals where a large portion of that 50 million ends up in their families pockets.

I know…I know some of you will say we can cut the military budget because they are the biggest spenders of our money. Not quite so, the welfare programs consume the most money in our country, and as of right now it is followed by Homeland Insecurity. Then the military.

Some people are going to say all this is a little far fetched or ten hat stuff because none of it will happen. Now we need to back up some because part of the congressional proposed health care plan says you will be required to have it and if you refuse you can and will be arrested. Now just what are they going to do with someone they arrest for refusing to subjugate themselves to government health control? Well they could for one throw you in jail, fine you, re-educate you, confiscate everything you owned…oops sorry you won’t be able to own anything soon anyway.

Soon after the implementation of this socialist dictatorship type program, if you refuse to comply then you will be jailed without a trial because it is cut and dry violation of orders of your task masters in government. And what are you going to do about it? Nothing because you have no means to resist and fight back.

Now we come to where it concerns guns. A doctor has deemed personal weapons as a public health hazard and all private weapons are confiscated. Yes you gave them up for what ever reason you thought you should and I can say with all honesty that 97% of the American gun owners will lay down and submit to government dictatorship with little more then a whimper. Allowing your government socialist rulers like fienstein, palosi, boxer, klinton, (all the females with a dick and balls), and people like dood, shameer, waxman, dingell, and kirk (all the men with pussies) to tell you just what you need and want. For your own good because your little people and cannot make that choice for your self’s.

There are many more of these socialists in government then I list here, these are just the few who stand out right now.

opaww

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Beautify America

I was looking at some old and new programs such as Beautify America, which covers everything from, get a tattoo to drive your corvette to work day. So I was thinking of just how I could start a Beautify America program and just what would it be? It came to me like being struck by lightning.

My Beautify America campaign would be to deport every anti-gunner in this country to China, Cuba, or some place more fitting for the piece of shits socialists they are. Just take a look at.

billery klinton on second thought no don’t look at her you might be turned to stone. That medusas needs to be deported to some place like iraq where she could single handedly end that war just be turning the enemy to stone.

sarah brady, this cow pie for a face un-American bitch needs to be deported to Russia where she could be put to good use giving oral sex to Putin. Instead of shoving her penis up the keasters of the pro freedom loving Americans she so much hates.

carolyn (barrel shroud) mccarthy could drop a picket fence at 50 paces with her ugly looks not to mention the devastation she could cause from her ugly inside.

nancy pissoly I mean pelosi This cesspool faced bitch could scare the shit right out of a constipated ass, so she could be put to work relieving the colons of the Chinese that are all plugged up.

osamaobama with his big ears could replace dumbo the elephant at Disney; just make it the Disney in Europe instead of America. Where he would fit right in with the other ugly American haters.

diana feinstein is so ugly that when she goes to take a dump she does not know which end to stick on the toilet. So she would fit right in someplace like Venezuela.

Let us clean up and make America beautiful again so the real Americans can enjoy it for what it is. Make this July and each July the month of Beautify America month. Deport a socialist.

opaww

Saturday, June 20, 2009

House Dems unveil full coverage socialist plan

I wrote this yesterday and sent it to my Rep.

Under the article I just finished reading about the “House Dems unveil full coverage health plan

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31442604/ns/politics-capitol_hill/

It says, “The plan would require individuals to get coverage and employers to contribute.” This sounds a lot like socialism and I am not a socialist so forcing me to obtain this coverage will just result in either you’re Government Shutting T.F.U. and going away or you can shoot and kill, either way I don’t got to put up with it and I won’t.

If it was made an option to have I might think about it but the Government has no authority to force me into any health care plan of theirs. This is paramount to declaring war on the freedoms to choose for our own self’s. This is one of the many things that really piss me off and I refuse to apologize for my language nor my anger at and toward the socialist state this administration is leading our once great country under the guise of for our own good.

I hope you realize that a hell of a lot of the American citizens are in fact mistrusting and hateful of this socialist Government and NO the government is not the country nor is anyone of the elite politicians that believe that they are rulers of us low life people. I can tell you now that I neither need nor want government controlling my life or me.

If you find offence in this e-mail I do not apologize for it. Sense you would be in support of a socialist country. If you do not find offence then there might just be hope for someone who will take up the mantel of freedom again. I got no qualms if you read this letter to the whole of congress and I hope you do.

Sincerely
opaww

Friday, June 19, 2009

Burn Baby Burn

While Nero played his lyre as he watched Rome burn in 64 A.D. whispers of his involvement were circulating shortly after. Seemingly Nero needing something to draw attention away from him, so the creation of a scapegoat fell to the Christians and many were rounded up and burnt at the stake for nothing more then being the whipping boys of Nero.

Nero seemingly catered to the lower classes of people during his reign of terror or power, whichever way one wants to look at it. Being very popular among the less fortunate and the working class of people he enjoyed popularity and was likened to being a God among them.

This allowed him to get away with much that normally would of ended in a very short reign of power and sudden death syndrome, which occurred often in the days of Rome.

Nero was one of the most corrupt and perverse Emperors to cross Rome, building an extravagant pleasure palace that had no rival. Labor was provided by forced and slave labor. The rich and/or well off were taxed heavily and most times to the point of everything they owned, then they were killed along with their families.

Make no mistake Nero by all accounts would of made a perfect liberal, democratic, socialist in our time. The comparison with Nero and today’s liberal, democratic, socialist is nothing less then uncanny.

While we have yet to see America burn, the comparison is still true. During the Watts riots in the 60’s we saw many stores and houses burnt to the ground. The L.A. riots during the 90’s saw fires all over the place. But nothing as of this time that could be likened to Rome during Nero’s reign.

Could a great fire that kills countless people and destroys billions of dollars of property happen in America? Yes it could if something dramatic happened to light the match, and the peoples were disarmed so they could not protect what is theirs, (commiefornia).

Could we see the heavy taxation of the rich and well off in America? Yes we can and we can see the desire to take from them in the very things our liberal, democratic, socialists are trying to do, and through the very words they spew forth with seemingly justifiable reasons they can create.

Could we see the execution of the rich/well off and their families? Not yet but as with anything fanatical liberals do it is possible. With the cat calls of the liberal, democratic, socialists in America to round up anyone who speaks out against them and/or can be accused of some form of hate speech this could be a clarion sign of the first step in mass murder of innocent American peoples. Kind of like the Jews during the socialist Hitler’s reign.

Will the liberal, democratic, socialists find something or someone to use as a scapegoat? They already do that if we just look at the anti-gun, anti-Christian, anti-right wing, anti-free speech rhetoric they pervert and spray out their cesspools for lips, one can see the use of an inanimate object and/or persons as our current day Nero’s scapegoat. Maybe just maybe it is not the object so much as it is the Second Amendment and/or the entire Bill of Rights that is actually the current day whipping boy of our Nero.

To clarify that our current day Nero is not an individual as was the Nero of Rome, but rather socialism which is more dangerous then a single individual sense it has many heads with many throats that would need to be cut to rid us of such a nasty beast. Though the socialists will say this is hate speech calling for the killing of their own kind, it is nothing more then a comparison.

During the reign of Nero in Rome if anyone spoke out against him or any of his laws they were quickly rounded up and executed. We can see the same desire with the socialists calling for the rounding up of anyone who uses some form of speech that the socialists want to call hate speech.

Just because I speak out against some form of treasoness policy, law, or person does not make it hate speech. Because I choose to not support or believe in a given political elitist does not make me a hate monger. Because I may choose to make a satire of a famous person does not make me a hate monger either. Regardless of what anyone wants to force me to believe I can and will hate and express it at my discretion and not yours. This is my right as a human being and you have only two choices. Like it or not you can, 1. STFU and go away or, 2. Shoot and kill, either way I don’t have to put up with you.

I am sure that we can find many more comparisons to Nero of Rome and our current day Nero of America, but in reality they are boring, not to mention full of dung up past their ears.

opaww

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

"The Police Have the Power to Suspend Your Rights"

You can read the post here at this link...I would look for this to happen more often in other parts of the U.S. This is a way of controlling people and if they can demand and get the public to believe it and not make a stand, this will become the norm in almost every city in America. People of LA. don't let this shit head get away with it, and the rest of the U.S for that matter.

http://waronguns.blogspot.com/

So says Shreveport, LA mayor Cedric Glover.Listen to Part A of Tom Gresham's "Gun Talk" for Sun, 14 June 2009, featuring guest Robert Baillio.

The page to access podcasts is here. http://guntalk.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=491553

Then when you're done, you might consider telling Cedric what you think of his unique view of the social compact. mayor@shreveportla.gov

I would also advise everyone to contact the Governor of LA. and exspress their displeasure with this and ask him to look into it.

http://www.gov.la.gov/index.cfm?md=form&tmp=email_governor

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Right Wing Extremists

Recently the DHS published a list of possible home grown terrorists, sighting such ridicules clames as Libertarians, returning Veterans from the iraq war, Republicans, people who are against abortion, people who are anti-illegal aliens, members of the Militias, and many more classes of people who just believe differently then the kool-aid drinking crowd.

The list has a very bad undertone to it, because it places almost every true American on the list of potential terrorists, making even speech against government policies and/or people a threat. Some place close to 40% of the listed groups are simply right wing believers. This is an indication of a true Nazi regime starting toward raring its ugly head.

If you really dig deep you can find that this trend is nothing more then a way to control the massive indigenes sheep in this country. By placing fear in their minds and harts. Liberals have and are behind this cesspool of demented thinking. When Raciest/terrorism is deeply imbedded in the liberals throughout our history.

The founder of the KKK was a democrat and democrats are liberals, most of the member of the KKK were democrats. Left leaning democrats are for the most part supporters of socialism; Hitler was a believer in socialism. This guy who killed a security guard in the Holocaust museum was a socialist not a right wing nut like some are trying to make everyone believe.

For the most part most democratic liberals are against free speech making them the actual terrorists in America. If you do not support the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as it is then you are a terrorists. The infamous Bobby Rush former leader of the terrorist group the Chicago Black Panthers wants to take away American rights lock stock and barrel making him a prominent terrorist and anti-American/freedom ass wipe.

The slime bags that wants to close down my web site and/or Blog because I don’t sing Kumbaya and hold hands with my glorious leader osamaobama are nothing more then terrorists. They would have me arrested and shipped by rail in cattle cars to re-educational camps for an attitude adjustment. (Execution by gas chamber sense it can handle more potential anti-socialists at a time.)

Let us just see whom this might be that would round us up and move us out. Maybe someone like Bonnie Erbe http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2009/06/11/round-up-hate-promoters-now-before-any-more-holocaust-museum-attacks.html because I don’t suck up to her ass spewing anti-American beliefs. Could it maybe be Janet Reno? No wait she would just have you killed in your own home instead of waist money transporting you some place else.

Erbe is nothing more then wasted trash of the left leaning socialists in America that are dragging this country into another civil war that will rival all to of existed.

Friday, June 12, 2009

This Piece of shit Sonia Sotomayor is dead wrong in her belief and ruling that the 14th Amendment is not incorporated into the Second Amendment.

If you look at the history of the Second Amendment as being part of the Bill of Rights then you find that it is an individual right, sense the Bill of Rights was written for the individuals and restrictions of the government from restricting the rights listed there in.

If we look at Amendment 1 it tells us that Congress shall make no law, not the state. So this being a order to congress forbidding congress from making laws restricting religion, freedom of speech, the press; the right of the people peaceably to assemble, petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment had to have the protection of the 14th Amendment along with other Amendments in order to keep states from instituting their own laws.

The Second Amendment; A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Nowhere in this Amendment are there any restrictions of just the Federal Government. Quite the contrary it alone applies to any and all governing bodies, local, county, State, and Federal. How can this be so one might ask? Well first it says the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. There is no mention of a restriction of a specific governing entity, but rather forbids any governing body from in acting infringements. Secondly the purpose was a well regulated Militia, and just what is a well regulated Militia?

Title 10, Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 13, Section 311 of the United States Code defines the Militia thusly: § 311. Militia: composition and classes

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are—

(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

This provides for the states to recognize and support (Non monetarily) a citizen Army to be called and directed by the Governor of each and every state. Which is not under the direction or authority of the Federal Government. The soul purpose of a Militia is to provide for the defense of the state, county, and city in which we live. There actions are governed by the Governor, then the sheriff, and lastly the chief of Police in their town. The Militia does not fall under the jurisdiction or authority of the federal Government in any way shape or form. To do so would make them just another federal controlled Army, and that is not the intent of each state to form its own Militias.

The National Guard was in the beginning an answer to the need for a Militia of the States, but as with most things the Federal Government usurped its authority and instituted authority and control over the National Guard. If you look the National Guard is under the Direction of the Governor, until the Federal Government has a need for them then they become a federal Army not covered by the Militia clause of the Second Amendment.

Contrary to miss conceived notions that the National Guard is the Militia among the Anti-freedom/anti-gunners the National Guard is National as it is stated in their name. The Militia is state only and is not subject to the powers of a corrupt federal Government.

As is provided by the laws governing the Militia one must be equipped with personal weapons and ammunitions that they must provide out of their own pockets. The State has no obligation to provide this along with other essensuals to the Militia. A State may if they feel the need and monetary fund permit can offer some supplies if the need arises.

Thusly we can see that the Militia as is referred to in the Second Amendment is a state formed and controlled entity. Making the Second Amendment applicable to the states as well and Federal Government.

In synopsis we can see that;
The second Amendment applies to the individual person in that it provides for the right of the people, not the right of the elite.

That the Militia as is referred to in the Second Amendment is made up of the individual person and they must provide their own arms and ammunition.

That the Militia is exclusively state Governed and at no time a part of any Federal body.
That the National guard is not the Militia because they can and are call upon by the Federal Government to be used outside the state and/or country to fight wars.

Now lastly a small part we have not covered; being necessary to the security of a free State. When referring to the individual State it was called the free State, or the several States. This was an implication of individuality among the State to be governed by such rule or law. Making the application of the Second Amendment a direct order against infringement by the State, and/or any Governing body regardless of whom it is.

The Second Amendment applies to any and all governments and need no 14th Amendment to protect it or incorporate it into the state. Sonia Sotomayor and her piece of shit collogues are dead wrong in their belief that the second Amendment does not apply to the State and the State/city can make their own laws restricting this God Given Right.

opaww